PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM TATA NEGARA DARURAT (STUDI KOMPARASI INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA MALAYSIA DAN SINGAPURA)

AbstrackThe research discusses the urgency of emergency constitutional law inthe regulation of the position of notary in the making of deeds duringthe Covid-19 Pandemic by comparing the regulations of the Governmentof Indonesia with the countries of Malaysia AND Singapore. Thisresearch uses an empirical legal research type. The approach of thisresearch is a legislative approach, a comparative approach, and a caseapproach. Data collection techniques by means of interviews and studyof documents and literature. The data analysis used in this study isqualitative descriptive. The results of this study are from theperspective of emergency constitutional law, because the Covid-19pandemic forced the state to deport the normal provisions of theNotary Position Law in order to balance public health protection withthe continuity of legal services. Indonesia responded through emergencyinstruments such as the Ministry of Law and Human Rights CircularLetter No. 7 of 2020 which legalized the practice of e-notaries on alimited basis, Malaysia was more cautious by maintaining physicalformalities for important deeds, while Singapore was able to fullyswitch to virtual notaries thanks to a mature digital infrastructure. Acomparative study of notary regulations during the Covid-19 pandemicin Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore reveals how the concept ofnational sovereignty shaped different legal responses.Keywords: Emergency Constitutional Law, Covid-19, and NotaryPositions