NATIONAL AND GLOBAL MODELS OF MANAGING INNOVATION IN THE MINING INDUSTRY: MECHANISMS OF COMPARISON AND HARMONIZATION

Innovation management in the mining industry is a subject of growing theoretical and practical importance. From the perspective of innovation economics, two dominant conceptual traditions can be distinguished. The first derives from the Schumpeterian theory of innovation, which emphasizes the role of creative destruction, entrepreneurship, and technological upgrading as drivers of competitiveness [1]. The second is rooted in national innovation system theory, where state institutions, universities, and industry actors jointly shape innovation outcomes through policies, investments, and knowledge flows [2]. In the mining sector, which combines high capital intensity, environmental sensitivity, and strategic importance for industrial development, both models are evident in different national contexts.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17292140
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NATIONAL AND GLOBAL MODELS OF MANAGING INNOVATION IN THE MINING INDUSTRY: MECHANISMS OF COMPARISON AND HARMONIZATION

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

NATIONAL AND GLOBAL MODELS OF MANAGING INNOVATION IN THE MINING INDUSTRY: MECHANISMS OF COMPARISON AND HARMONIZATION

article en

Abstract

Innovation management in the mining industry is a subject of growing theoretical and practical importance. From the perspective of innovation economics, two dominant conceptual traditions can be distinguished. The first derives from the Schumpeterian theory of innovation, which emphasizes the role of creative destruction, entrepreneurship, and technological upgrading as drivers of competitiveness [1]. The second is rooted in national innovation system theory, where state institutions, universities, and industry actors jointly shape innovation outcomes through policies, investments, and knowledge flows [2]. In the mining sector, which combines high capital intensity, environmental sensitivity, and strategic importance for industrial development, both models are evident in different national contexts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.