The Quest for Environmental Knowledge: Biologists, Dam-Building and Environmentalism in the Brazilian Amazon

In the 1970s and 1980s, Brazil built several large dams in the Amazon rainforest and contracted the National Institute for Research of the Amazon (INPA) to study their environmental impact. The article explores the activities of INPA’s biologists and their role in the changing perception of dam-building. Based on INPA publications and archival material about dam-related conflicts it argues that science had little impact on the discursive paradigm shift from good to bad dams and that ‘hard’ science did not have more epistemic power than local grassroots knowledge produced by the anti-dam movement. The data gathered by the biologists had no practical value and could not prevent environmental damage. When the dictatorship ended in 1985, INPA changed sides and promoted the anti-dam agenda. What finally mattered was the ability to connect science to a political narrative.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and History
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/whpeh.63861480327373
Primary Topic
Tryptophan and brain disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Quest for Environmental Knowledge: Biologists, Dam-Building and Environmentalism in the Brazilian Amazon

Environment and History
Tryptophan and brain disorders
article

The Quest for Environmental Knowledge: Biologists, Dam-Building and Environmentalism in the Brazilian Amazon

article en

Abstract

In the 1970s and 1980s, Brazil built several large dams in the Amazon rainforest and contracted the National Institute for Research of the Amazon (INPA) to study their environmental impact. The article explores the activities of INPA’s biologists and their role in the changing perception of dam-building. Based on INPA publications and archival material about dam-related conflicts it argues that science had little impact on the discursive paradigm shift from good to bad dams and that ‘hard’ science did not have more epistemic power than local grassroots knowledge produced by the anti-dam movement. The data gathered by the biologists had no practical value and could not prevent environmental damage. When the dictatorship ended in 1985, INPA changed sides and promoted the anti-dam agenda. What finally mattered was the ability to connect science to a political narrative.

Environment and HistoryVol. 31(4)
University of Cologne (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Tryptophan and brain disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.