Challenges and solutions in managing semi-natural grasslands: Insights from Estonia

Semi-natural grasslands (SNGs) are among Europe's most diverse ecosystems, supporting biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural heritage. Yet, around 90 % of their area has been lost in the past century due to intensification, urbanization, and abandonment, making effective management and restoration a conservation priority. This study examines the perspectives of Estonian SNG managers within the context of existing practices and policies. Data were collected through 280 online questionnaires and 91 structured interviews. While farmers are generally motivated to continue management, driven by values such as tradition, biodiversity, and landscape aesthetics, they face multiple barriers. These include low cost-effectiveness, rigid regulations (e.g., fixed mowing dates), limited access to biodiversity advisory services, and challenges linked to administration and land rental. Our findings highlight several shortcomings in current support schemes. Action-based subsidies often fail to reflect local ecological and socio-economic realities, reducing both efficiency and farmer engagement. To ensure long-term SNG viability, policies should become more flexible, cost-effective, and outcome-oriented. This includes adopting results-based payments, expanding advisory services, and strengthening collaboration between land managers, authorities, and conservation experts. By centering on farmers' perspectives, this study provides insights into how policy design can better align ecological objectives with practical land management. Addressing the identified gaps could enhance the sustainability of SNG management in Estonia and offer lessons for similar landscapes across Europe. • Estonia retains a significant area of well-preserved semi-natural grasslands. • Semi-natural grassland policies should be flexible, well-funded, and well-advised. • Subsidies should reflect habitat quality and ecosystem services provided. • Investment support should be easily accessible to all SNG managers. • SNG managers should be included in policymaking and recognized for their vital role.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111520
Primary Topic
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and solutions in managing semi-natural grasslands: Insights from Estonia

Biological Conservation
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
article

Challenges and solutions in managing semi-natural grasslands: Insights from Estonia

article en

Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands (SNGs) are among Europe's most diverse ecosystems, supporting biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural heritage. Yet, around 90 % of their area has been lost in the past century due to intensification, urbanization, and abandonment, making effective management and restoration a conservation priority. This study examines the perspectives of Estonian SNG managers within the context of existing practices and policies. Data were collected through 280 online questionnaires and 91 structured interviews. While farmers are generally motivated to continue management, driven by values such as tradition, biodiversity, and landscape aesthetics, they face multiple barriers. These include low cost-effectiveness, rigid regulations (e.g., fixed mowing dates), limited access to biodiversity advisory services, and challenges linked to administration and land rental. Our findings highlight several shortcomings in current support schemes. Action-based subsidies often fail to reflect local ecological and socio-economic realities, reducing both efficiency and farmer engagement. To ensure long-term SNG viability, policies should become more flexible, cost-effective, and outcome-oriented. This includes adopting results-based payments, expanding advisory services, and strengthening collaboration between land managers, authorities, and conservation experts. By centering on farmers' perspectives, this study provides insights into how policy design can better align ecological objectives with practical land management. Addressing the identified gaps could enhance the sustainability of SNG management in Estonia and offer lessons for similar landscapes across Europe. • Estonia retains a significant area of well-preserved semi-natural grasslands. • Semi-natural grassland policies should be flexible, well-funded, and well-advised. • Subsidies should reflect habitat quality and ecosystem services provided. • Investment support should be easily accessible to all SNG managers. • SNG managers should be included in policymaking and recognized for their vital role.

Biological ConservationVol. 313
Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), Forest Research (GB), University of Tartu (EE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.