BALANCING SAFETY AND EFFICACY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POT-SIDE-POT AND KBI IN PROVISIONAL BIFURCATION STENTING

Background: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) present significant challenges in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) due to complex anatomy and increased risk of side branch (SB) complications. The optimal technique for SB optimization—Kissing Balloon Inflation (KBI) versus Proximal Optimization Technique with sequential SB inflation (POT-side-POT)—remains debated. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of POT-side-POT versus KBI within a provisional stenting strategy for non-complex CBLs. Methods: This retrospective study included 60 patients undergoing PCI for CBLs at Al-Latakia University Hospital between June 2021 and June 2024. Patients were allocated to POT-side-POT (n=30) or KBI (n=30) at operator discretion. Inclusion criteria included main vessel diameter >2.5 mm and SB diameter >2 mm. Primary endpoints included combined adverse events, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), stent thrombosis, SB dissection, and need for additional SB stenting. Statistical analysis incorporated inverse probability weighting (IPW) to reduce bias. Results: Demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory values were similar between groups. Procedural time and contrast volume were higher in KBI. Residual SB stenosis and rates of SB dissection and additional stenting were higher in the KBI group after IPW adjustment. No in-hospital or 30-day mortality occurred in either group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated POT-side-POT superiority in true bifurcation lesions regarding procedural efficiency and SB complication reduction without increasing CI-AKI or mortality. Conclusion: POT-side-POT offers a safe and efficient strategy for provisional stenting of non-complex coronary bifurcations, reducing SB dissection and stent thrombosis while minimizing procedural time and contrast exposure. KBI remains a viable secondary option when additional SB expansion is required. These findings support POT-side-POT as the preferred technique in routine practice for non-complex CBLs.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17276247
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BALANCING SAFETY AND EFFICACY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POT-SIDE-POT AND KBI IN PROVISIONAL BIFURCATION STENTING

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

BALANCING SAFETY AND EFFICACY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POT-SIDE-POT AND KBI IN PROVISIONAL BIFURCATION STENTING

article en

Abstract

Background: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) present significant challenges in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) due to complex anatomy and increased risk of side branch (SB) complications. The optimal technique for SB optimization—Kissing Balloon Inflation (KBI) versus Proximal Optimization Technique with sequential SB inflation (POT-side-POT)—remains debated. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of POT-side-POT versus KBI within a provisional stenting strategy for non-complex CBLs. Methods: This retrospective study included 60 patients undergoing PCI for CBLs at Al-Latakia University Hospital between June 2021 and June 2024. Patients were allocated to POT-side-POT (n=30) or KBI (n=30) at operator discretion. Inclusion criteria included main vessel diameter >2.5 mm and SB diameter >2 mm. Primary endpoints included combined adverse events, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), stent thrombosis, SB dissection, and need for additional SB stenting. Statistical analysis incorporated inverse probability weighting (IPW) to reduce bias. Results: Demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory values were similar between groups. Procedural time and contrast volume were higher in KBI. Residual SB stenosis and rates of SB dissection and additional stenting were higher in the KBI group after IPW adjustment. No in-hospital or 30-day mortality occurred in either group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated POT-side-POT superiority in true bifurcation lesions regarding procedural efficiency and SB complication reduction without increasing CI-AKI or mortality. Conclusion: POT-side-POT offers a safe and efficient strategy for provisional stenting of non-complex coronary bifurcations, reducing SB dissection and stent thrombosis while minimizing procedural time and contrast exposure. KBI remains a viable secondary option when additional SB expansion is required. These findings support POT-side-POT as the preferred technique in routine practice for non-complex CBLs.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

BALANCING SAFETY AND EFFICACY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POT-SIDE-POT AND KBI IN PROVISIONAL BIFURCATION STENTING · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS