FAIR Social Science Data Enhancement

Research data infrastructures aiming to improve FAIR principles often focus on enhancing metadata. However, most FAIR principles apply to both data and metadata. Interoperability aspects, in particular, can be emphasised, such as standardised knowledge representation, the use of FAIR-compliant vocabularies, and explicit references to other data (Bahim et al. 2020). This presentation discusses areas of data planning and processing that can make data more FAIR. Enhancing FAIRness increases the overall reusability and analytic potential of data, including the possibilities of merging and combining different data sources. It is important to train researchers in established best practices that increase reusability (e.g. http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI). For example, comparability of data and conceptual clarity can be improved by using standard social science variables. Standard social science classifications can be derived using shared computer code (see https://www.gesis.org/en/missy/materials/EU-SILC/tools/datahandling). Data infrastructure services are often asked for advice regarding Data Management Planning, which requires maximising FAIR aspects. Historical research projects that use printed archival resources from the past (Mezzoli, 2022, https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_HDS47_V1) have unified the coding framework from different periods and locations. The variable operationalisations from key social science studies have known reliability and validity characteristics, which the CESSDA European Question Bank, with full survey question text in DDI format, will provide. The use of FAIR-compliant vocabularies, such as the European Language Social Science Thesaurus, to document the conceptual content of data at a granular level can add an additional layer of FAIRness (see https://www.cessda.eu/Tools). In conclusion, a higher return on investment can be expected by publishing FAIR-compliant data (Inau et al. 2023, https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e45013). Repositories can establish evaluation criteria for data that respect different aspects of FAIR data (e.g. https://pubmet2024.unizd.hr/janez-stebe-abstract/).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17279388
Primary Topic
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FAIR Social Science Data Enhancement

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
article

FAIR Social Science Data Enhancement

article en

Abstract

Research data infrastructures aiming to improve FAIR principles often focus on enhancing metadata. However, most FAIR principles apply to both data and metadata. Interoperability aspects, in particular, can be emphasised, such as standardised knowledge representation, the use of FAIR-compliant vocabularies, and explicit references to other data (Bahim et al. 2020). This presentation discusses areas of data planning and processing that can make data more FAIR. Enhancing FAIRness increases the overall reusability and analytic potential of data, including the possibilities of merging and combining different data sources. It is important to train researchers in established best practices that increase reusability (e.g. http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI). For example, comparability of data and conceptual clarity can be improved by using standard social science variables. Standard social science classifications can be derived using shared computer code (see https://www.gesis.org/en/missy/materials/EU-SILC/tools/datahandling). Data infrastructure services are often asked for advice regarding Data Management Planning, which requires maximising FAIR aspects. Historical research projects that use printed archival resources from the past (Mezzoli, 2022, https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_HDS47_V1) have unified the coding framework from different periods and locations. The variable operationalisations from key social science studies have known reliability and validity characteristics, which the CESSDA European Question Bank, with full survey question text in DDI format, will provide. The use of FAIR-compliant vocabularies, such as the European Language Social Science Thesaurus, to document the conceptual content of data at a granular level can add an additional layer of FAIRness (see https://www.cessda.eu/Tools). In conclusion, a higher return on investment can be expected by publishing FAIR-compliant data (Inau et al. 2023, https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e45013). Repositories can establish evaluation criteria for data that respect different aspects of FAIR data (e.g. https://pubmet2024.unizd.hr/janez-stebe-abstract/).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.