KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE & PRACTICE OF BIOMEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT AMONG THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS WORKING IN PHC AT GADAG TALUK KARNATAKA

Background: Biomedical waste (BMW) generated in healthcare settings is hazardous and poses threats to health and environment if not managed appropriately. Mismanagement of biomedical waste can result in spread of infections such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and C among healthcare workers and the general public. Biomedical Waste Management (BMWM) Rules 2016 have mandated segregation, collection, transportation, and disposal of biomedical waste using color-coded systems to reduce the risks associated with infectious and hazardous waste (CPCB, 2016).[6] Objectives: 1.To assess knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) regarding biomedical waste management among staff working in Primary Health Centers (PHCs) in Gadag Taluka, Karnataka. 2. To observe biomedical waste management practices at PHCs using structured observation checklists. Materials and Methods: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers in 15 PHC’s of Gadag Taluka. A Universal sampling technique was adopted to include doctors, nurses, lab technicians, pharmacists, and Group D staff. Data collection involved a semi-structured questionnaire covering KAP domains and a structured observation checklist. The collected data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel and expressed in frequencies and percentages. Results: Among 214 participants, 80% of doctors and 52.8% of pharmacy staff had good knowledge of BMWM. Group D staff had the lowest knowledge scores, with 26.4% categorized as poor. Adequate practices were observed among 87.6% of doctors, 75.6% of pharmacy staff, and 63.9% of nurses. Group D staff had the highest proportion of inadequate practices (36.8%). Attitudinal assessment revealed that 100% of doctors had good attitudes towards BMWM, followed by 80% of pharmacy staff and 73.3% of lab technicians. Observations revealed significant lapses in segregation, labeling, and use of color-coded bins in many PHCs. Conclusion: The study found that while clinical staff demonstrated high knowledge and positive attitudes towards BMWM, significant deficiencies were observed among nursing and Group D staff. There is a critical need for continuous training, monitoring, and provision of resources to ensure full compliance with BMWM Rules.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17275390
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE & PRACTICE OF BIOMEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT AMONG THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS WORKING IN PHC AT GADAG TALUK KARNATAKA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
article

KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE & PRACTICE OF BIOMEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT AMONG THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS WORKING IN PHC AT GADAG TALUK KARNATAKA

article en

Abstract

Background: Biomedical waste (BMW) generated in healthcare settings is hazardous and poses threats to health and environment if not managed appropriately. Mismanagement of biomedical waste can result in spread of infections such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and C among healthcare workers and the general public. Biomedical Waste Management (BMWM) Rules 2016 have mandated segregation, collection, transportation, and disposal of biomedical waste using color-coded systems to reduce the risks associated with infectious and hazardous waste (CPCB, 2016).[6] Objectives: 1.To assess knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) regarding biomedical waste management among staff working in Primary Health Centers (PHCs) in Gadag Taluka, Karnataka. 2. To observe biomedical waste management practices at PHCs using structured observation checklists. Materials and Methods: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers in 15 PHC’s of Gadag Taluka. A Universal sampling technique was adopted to include doctors, nurses, lab technicians, pharmacists, and Group D staff. Data collection involved a semi-structured questionnaire covering KAP domains and a structured observation checklist. The collected data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel and expressed in frequencies and percentages. Results: Among 214 participants, 80% of doctors and 52.8% of pharmacy staff had good knowledge of BMWM. Group D staff had the lowest knowledge scores, with 26.4% categorized as poor. Adequate practices were observed among 87.6% of doctors, 75.6% of pharmacy staff, and 63.9% of nurses. Group D staff had the highest proportion of inadequate practices (36.8%). Attitudinal assessment revealed that 100% of doctors had good attitudes towards BMWM, followed by 80% of pharmacy staff and 73.3% of lab technicians. Observations revealed significant lapses in segregation, labeling, and use of color-coded bins in many PHCs. Conclusion: The study found that while clinical staff demonstrated high knowledge and positive attitudes towards BMWM, significant deficiencies were observed among nursing and Group D staff. There is a critical need for continuous training, monitoring, and provision of resources to ensure full compliance with BMWM Rules.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE & PRACTICE OF BIOMEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT AMONG THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS WORKING IN PHC AT GADAG TALUK KARNATAKA · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS