A Literature Review: Effectiveness of Causal Learning Model in Improving Problem-Solving Ability

The development of innovative learning models in the last decade demands a systematic evaluation of their effectiveness and implementation trends. This article presents a systematic literature review of 500 indexed publications (2016-2025) to analyze the development, impact, and research trends of causal learning models in improving learners' problem-solving skills, particularly in science learning. The analysis revealed a significant increase in publications related to this model, with a growth of 25% per year, although fluctuations occurred in certain periods. The dominance of research is in the form of journal articles (62 publications) with a primary focus on physics, with the Journal of Physics and Technology Education being the most productive source (17 articles, 122 citations). Empirical evidence is strong that the causal model, especially when combined with scaffolding, is effective in improving problem-solving skills (the top article received 36 citations). Conceptual mapping through VOSviewer showed close links between the model and critical thinking skills, conceptual understanding, and science learning. These findings strengthen the position of the causalytic model as a relevant learning strategy to address the challenges of 21st-century education, while highlighting the need for further research related to implementation across disciplines and educational contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contextual Natural Science Education Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/cnsej.v3i2.1080
Primary Topic
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Literature Review: Effectiveness of Causal Learning Model in Improving Problem-Solving Ability

Contextual Natural Science Education Journal
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
article

A Literature Review: Effectiveness of Causal Learning Model in Improving Problem-Solving Ability

article en

Abstract

The development of innovative learning models in the last decade demands a systematic evaluation of their effectiveness and implementation trends. This article presents a systematic literature review of 500 indexed publications (2016-2025) to analyze the development, impact, and research trends of causal learning models in improving learners' problem-solving skills, particularly in science learning. The analysis revealed a significant increase in publications related to this model, with a growth of 25% per year, although fluctuations occurred in certain periods. The dominance of research is in the form of journal articles (62 publications) with a primary focus on physics, with the Journal of Physics and Technology Education being the most productive source (17 articles, 122 citations). Empirical evidence is strong that the causal model, especially when combined with scaffolding, is effective in improving problem-solving skills (the top article received 36 citations). Conceptual mapping through VOSviewer showed close links between the model and critical thinking skills, conceptual understanding, and science learning. These findings strengthen the position of the causalytic model as a relevant learning strategy to address the challenges of 21st-century education, while highlighting the need for further research related to implementation across disciplines and educational contexts.

Contextual Natural Science Education JournalVol. 3(2)
University of Mataram (ID)
Universitas Mataram
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.