On the techniques for primary calibration of electronic radon detectors

Successful calibration of RadonEye +2 electronic radon detectors was performed at typical indoor activity concentrations using the facilities at LNHB and PTB. The calibration uncertainties using primary radon activity standards were: below 1.5 % at 300 Bq/m3, below 1.7 % at 130 Bq/m3 and below 2.5 % at 55 Bq/m3 (k = 1). When using the secondary standard AlphaGUARD, the uncertainty at 55 Bq/m3 was below 3.5 %. Maintaining stable activity concentrations proved crucial and appears to be the only feasible approach for calibrations below 100 Bq/m3. While calibration under exponentially decaying radon activity concentration remains useful for evaluating the devices’ linearity across a broad range, it proved unsuitable for calibration of user-grade monitors at low activities due to the high statistical variation in their signal. The linearity of RadonEye +2 was demonstrated in the range 50 Bq/m3 - 300 Bq/m3 and they will be utilized for the sensor networks developed within the RadonNET project. Dynamic background correction, applicable to non-spectrometric detectors, was applied based on the monitor's exposure history. Furthermore, it was observed that the pulse-processing algorithm of RadonEyes +2 distorts the Poisson distribution of the signal, thereby increasing its variation. Potentially, lower measurement uncertainty could be achieved with electronic radon detectors that report the registered pulses and allow access to their processing algorithms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PTB-OAR
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7795/810.20251001d
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the techniques for primary calibration of electronic radon detectors

PTB-OAR
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

On the techniques for primary calibration of electronic radon detectors

article en

Abstract

Successful calibration of RadonEye +2 electronic radon detectors was performed at typical indoor activity concentrations using the facilities at LNHB and PTB. The calibration uncertainties using primary radon activity standards were: below 1.5 % at 300 Bq/m3, below 1.7 % at 130 Bq/m3 and below 2.5 % at 55 Bq/m3 (k = 1). When using the secondary standard AlphaGUARD, the uncertainty at 55 Bq/m3 was below 3.5 %. Maintaining stable activity concentrations proved crucial and appears to be the only feasible approach for calibrations below 100 Bq/m3. While calibration under exponentially decaying radon activity concentration remains useful for evaluating the devices’ linearity across a broad range, it proved unsuitable for calibration of user-grade monitors at low activities due to the high statistical variation in their signal. The linearity of RadonEye +2 was demonstrated in the range 50 Bq/m3 - 300 Bq/m3 and they will be utilized for the sensor networks developed within the RadonNET project. Dynamic background correction, applicable to non-spectrometric detectors, was applied based on the monitor's exposure history. Furthermore, it was observed that the pulse-processing algorithm of RadonEyes +2 distorts the Poisson distribution of the signal, thereby increasing its variation. Potentially, lower measurement uncertainty could be achieved with electronic radon detectors that report the registered pulses and allow access to their processing algorithms.

PTB-OAR
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), University Hospital St. Ivan Rilski (BG), Centre Inria de Saclay (FR), Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.