Bridging Fundamental Combustion Analysis and Engine Knock Behavior -1st Report, CFR Engine Test for Various RON Fuels

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">A collaborative study was conducted to bridge the gap between fundamental combustion research and engine-scale observations of knock in spark-ignition (SI) engines. Using Primary Reference Fuels (PRFs) with Research Octane Numbers (RON) of 80, 90, and 100, experiments were carried out with a Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR) engine at air-fuel ratio, λ = 1.0, focusing on knock onset conditions in terms of unburned gas pressure and temperature. In the engine tests, pressure traces under knocking conditions were analyzed to identify knock onset and to estimate the corresponding unburned gas temperature history. Results showed that the pressure at knock onset varies clearly with PRF value: higher RON fuels exhibited knock onset at higher pressures, likely due to changes in compression ratio applied to match standard RON test procedures. In contrast, the unburned gas temperature conditions showed partial overlap across different PRFs, but with a tendency for higher RON fuels to experience knock onset at slightly higher temperatures. These findings provide a coherent dataset linking engine-based knock behavior with fundamental combustion characteristics, forming the foundation for the reaction-kinetics-based analysis presented in the second report. Additionally, the CFR engine experiments were also conducted at λ = 0.88 to support the comparison with standard RON measurement conditions.</div></div>

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-0391
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Archaeological and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Fundamental Combustion Analysis and Engine Knock Behavior -1st Report, CFR Engine Test for Various RON Fuels

1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Archaeological and Historical Studies
8.27
article

Bridging Fundamental Combustion Analysis and Engine Knock Behavior -1st Report, CFR Engine Test for Various RON Fuels

article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">A collaborative study was conducted to bridge the gap between fundamental combustion research and engine-scale observations of knock in spark-ignition (SI) engines. Using Primary Reference Fuels (PRFs) with Research Octane Numbers (RON) of 80, 90, and 100, experiments were carried out with a Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR) engine at air-fuel ratio, λ = 1.0, focusing on knock onset conditions in terms of unburned gas pressure and temperature. In the engine tests, pressure traces under knocking conditions were analyzed to identify knock onset and to estimate the corresponding unburned gas temperature history. Results showed that the pressure at knock onset varies clearly with PRF value: higher RON fuels exhibited knock onset at higher pressures, likely due to changes in compression ratio applied to match standard RON test procedures. In contrast, the unburned gas temperature conditions showed partial overlap across different PRFs, but with a tendency for higher RON fuels to experience knock onset at slightly higher temperatures. These findings provide a coherent dataset linking engine-based knock behavior with fundamental combustion characteristics, forming the foundation for the reaction-kinetics-based analysis presented in the second report. Additionally, the CFR engine experiments were also conducted at λ = 0.88 to support the comparison with standard RON measurement conditions.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Tohoku University (JP), Eneos (Japan) (JP)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Archaeological and Historical Studies
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.