Industrial policy in production networks: which sectors to promote in Brazil?

This paper presents the theoretical framework developed by Liu (2019) for analyzing the impacts of industrial policy, with applications to South Korea, China, and Brazil. Using a general equilibrium model that incorporates market imperfections and input-output linkages, Liu (2019) demonstrates the existence of a synthetic measure – distortion centrality – related to a sector’s position within the production network. This measure indicates: a) which sectors should receive targeted subsidies; and b) the optimal priority ranking among them. We discuss Liu’s (2019) main findings when applying this framework to assess industrial policies in South Korea during the 1970s and in modern-day China. The results show a strong correlation between the sectors prioritized in these historical experiences and the ranking recommended by the theory. As an original empirical application, we compute the sectoral ranking for Brazil in 2019, identifying the industries that, according to this framework, should be prioritized for government support. The key findings are: i) industrial sectors dominate among those classified as high-priority, but some industries fall outside the group recommended for subsidies; ii) in the service sectors, there are both intermediate-priority sectors and those for which government support is not advised; and iii) agricultural sectors are within the eligible range for support but rank at the lower end of the priority scale.

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38116/rtm36art5
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial policy in production networks: which sectors to promote in Brazil?

Global trade and economics
article

Industrial policy in production networks: which sectors to promote in Brazil?

article en

Abstract

This paper presents the theoretical framework developed by Liu (2019) for analyzing the impacts of industrial policy, with applications to South Korea, China, and Brazil. Using a general equilibrium model that incorporates market imperfections and input-output linkages, Liu (2019) demonstrates the existence of a synthetic measure – distortion centrality – related to a sector’s position within the production network. This measure indicates: a) which sectors should receive targeted subsidies; and b) the optimal priority ranking among them. We discuss Liu’s (2019) main findings when applying this framework to assess industrial policies in South Korea during the 1970s and in modern-day China. The results show a strong correlation between the sectors prioritized in these historical experiences and the ranking recommended by the theory. As an original empirical application, we compute the sectoral ranking for Brazil in 2019, identifying the industries that, according to this framework, should be prioritized for government support. The key findings are: i) industrial sectors dominate among those classified as high-priority, but some industries fall outside the group recommended for subsidies; ii) in the service sectors, there are both intermediate-priority sectors and those for which government support is not advised; and iii) agricultural sectors are within the eligible range for support but rank at the lower end of the priority scale.

(36)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.