Estimer et expliquer l'incertitude prédictive en apprentissage automatique

Although Machine Learning (ML) models have proved to be useful in key applications, they still have significant limitations, such as sensitivity to distribution shifts. Therefore, it is essential to provide trustworthy monitoring methods when ML models make predictions on new unlabeled data. For an ML model, predictive uncertainty is defined as the uncertainty of predictions, which can be caused by the data or the model. As they identify insufficient knowledge, uncertainty estimates can thus be employed to monitor ML models' predictions and make decision-making safer and more reliable in applications such as financial risk assessment or medical diagnosis. In this thesis, we investigate the problem of estimating and explaining predictive uncertainty in ML. We introduce various methods to improve the quantification and explanation of predictive uncertainty in classification or regression tasks and through different settings such as multimodality or distribution shifts. In particular, we introduce a method to produce adaptive prediction intervals in regression tasks. To address classification tasks under distribution shifts, we first propose a method to quantify and visualize predictive uncertainty with simple representations. We then extend the research to a multimodal Transformer which quantifies uncertainty by design. Also, this architecture makes it possible to explain predictive uncertainty in terms of feature values. As uncertainty quantification is closely related to unsupervised performance estimation, we then introduce a method for practitioners to assess the model's performance in out-of-distribution contexts. Lastly and as a first step toward trustworthy ML, we introduce a risk-based approach and a reporting tool which aim to produce safe machine learning lifecycles.

Publication Details

Journal
theses.fr (ABES)
Published
2025-06-23
Primary Topic
Medical History and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimer et expliquer l'incertitude prédictive en apprentissage automatique

theses.fr (ABES)
Medical History and Innovations
article

Estimer et expliquer l'incertitude prédictive en apprentissage automatique

article en

Abstract

Although Machine Learning (ML) models have proved to be useful in key applications, they still have significant limitations, such as sensitivity to distribution shifts. Therefore, it is essential to provide trustworthy monitoring methods when ML models make predictions on new unlabeled data. For an ML model, predictive uncertainty is defined as the uncertainty of predictions, which can be caused by the data or the model. As they identify insufficient knowledge, uncertainty estimates can thus be employed to monitor ML models' predictions and make decision-making safer and more reliable in applications such as financial risk assessment or medical diagnosis. In this thesis, we investigate the problem of estimating and explaining predictive uncertainty in ML. We introduce various methods to improve the quantification and explanation of predictive uncertainty in classification or regression tasks and through different settings such as multimodality or distribution shifts. In particular, we introduce a method to produce adaptive prediction intervals in regression tasks. To address classification tasks under distribution shifts, we first propose a method to quantify and visualize predictive uncertainty with simple representations. We then extend the research to a multimodal Transformer which quantifies uncertainty by design. Also, this architecture makes it possible to explain predictive uncertainty in terms of feature values. As uncertainty quantification is closely related to unsupervised performance estimation, we then introduce a method for practitioners to assess the model's performance in out-of-distribution contexts. Lastly and as a first step toward trustworthy ML, we introduce a risk-based approach and a reporting tool which aim to produce safe machine learning lifecycles.

theses.fr (ABES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Medical History and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.