No Peace Without Democracy, No Democracy Without Peace: Comparative Perspectives on Political Transitions in Africa

This article analyzes the interlinked dynamics between peace and democracy through a comparative study of three African cases: Ghana, Tunisia, and Sierra Leone. Challenging linear models that view peace as a prerequisite for democratization, it argues that democratic practices and institutions can themselves be sources of lasting peace. Using a qualitative approach and a moderately contrasting case selection, the study examines how inclusive governance, civil society engagement, and institutional legitimacy have shaped both democratic resilience and post-conflict stability. By connecting empirical observations with theoretical debates on democratic peace and peacebuilding, the article puts forward the hypothesis that “paving the way to peace is also paving the way to democracy; investing in democracy means investing in sustainable peace.” It presents an analytical framework for a better understanding of political transitions in fragile or hybrid regimes. Peace and democracy emerge as closely intertwined processes whose stability depends on their parallel and complementary development—a particularly critical imperative in contexts marked by historical ruptures, weak state capacity, and recurrent political violence.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17272352
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Peace Without Democracy, No Democracy Without Peace: Comparative Perspectives on Political Transitions in Africa

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
UAV Applications and Optimization
article

No Peace Without Democracy, No Democracy Without Peace: Comparative Perspectives on Political Transitions in Africa

article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the interlinked dynamics between peace and democracy through a comparative study of three African cases: Ghana, Tunisia, and Sierra Leone. Challenging linear models that view peace as a prerequisite for democratization, it argues that democratic practices and institutions can themselves be sources of lasting peace. Using a qualitative approach and a moderately contrasting case selection, the study examines how inclusive governance, civil society engagement, and institutional legitimacy have shaped both democratic resilience and post-conflict stability. By connecting empirical observations with theoretical debates on democratic peace and peacebuilding, the article puts forward the hypothesis that “paving the way to peace is also paving the way to democracy; investing in democracy means investing in sustainable peace.” It presents an analytical framework for a better understanding of political transitions in fragile or hybrid regimes. Peace and democracy emerge as closely intertwined processes whose stability depends on their parallel and complementary development—a particularly critical imperative in contexts marked by historical ruptures, weak state capacity, and recurrent political violence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
National Observatory (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
UAV Applications and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.