Translating flame retardant strategies: Analogy from polyolefins and bisphenol a polycarbonates to poly(limonene carbonate)

• Four flame-retardant systems were successfully tested on poly(limonene carbonate) • Systems used in commercial polyolefins perform the best in poly(limonene carbonate) • Aluminium hydroxide proved to be the most efficient flame retardant • Poly(limonene carbonate) shows potential as a bio-based polymer in fire-risk uses . Poly(limonene carbonate)—PLimC—offers a novel sustainable alternative to traditional polymers, as it is derived from renewable limonene and carbon dioxide as monomers. Proposing PLimC as a future technical polymer for applications in electrical and electronic (E&E) devices, construction, and transportation, PLimC must meet specific fire prevention standards to be deemed suitable. Starting from the chemical structure of PLimC, strategies in analogy to flame retarded bisphenol A polycarbonates (PC), PC blends, and polyolefins (PO) are investigated to identify the most effective route to enhance the flame resistance of PLimC. This study utilized four halogen-free flame-retardant (FR) systems: APP + pentaerythritol (standard intumescent system in PO), a phosphorus flame retardant+PTFE as anti-dripping agent (used in PC blends), metal hydroxide ATH (widely used in PO), and potassium sulfonate salt (specific solution for PC). Applying these FRs at typical PC, PC blends, and PO loadings, we aim to understand their effect on PLimC and evaluated the different flame-retardant routes. Our experimental evaluations focused on the thermal properties, flammability, and fire behavior of each system. ATH emerged as the most effective, reducing the effective heat of combustion from 29.3 MJ kg⁻¹ to 18.6 MJ kg⁻¹ and the total heat evolved from 95 to 55 MJ m⁻². It also resulted in an increase in the limiting oxygen index from 17.1 to 26 vol.-% O 2 , along with a UL 94 HB40 rating. The intumescent system also exhibited considerable flame retardancy, highlighting the similarity of PLimC’s fire behavior to that of PO rather than PC. .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2025.111711
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating flame retardant strategies: Analogy from polyolefins and bisphenol a polycarbonates to poly(limonene carbonate)

1 citations
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
article

Translating flame retardant strategies: Analogy from polyolefins and bisphenol a polycarbonates to poly(limonene carbonate)

article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Four flame-retardant systems were successfully tested on poly(limonene carbonate) • Systems used in commercial polyolefins perform the best in poly(limonene carbonate) • Aluminium hydroxide proved to be the most efficient flame retardant • Poly(limonene carbonate) shows potential as a bio-based polymer in fire-risk uses . Poly(limonene carbonate)—PLimC—offers a novel sustainable alternative to traditional polymers, as it is derived from renewable limonene and carbon dioxide as monomers. Proposing PLimC as a future technical polymer for applications in electrical and electronic (E&E) devices, construction, and transportation, PLimC must meet specific fire prevention standards to be deemed suitable. Starting from the chemical structure of PLimC, strategies in analogy to flame retarded bisphenol A polycarbonates (PC), PC blends, and polyolefins (PO) are investigated to identify the most effective route to enhance the flame resistance of PLimC. This study utilized four halogen-free flame-retardant (FR) systems: APP + pentaerythritol (standard intumescent system in PO), a phosphorus flame retardant+PTFE as anti-dripping agent (used in PC blends), metal hydroxide ATH (widely used in PO), and potassium sulfonate salt (specific solution for PC). Applying these FRs at typical PC, PC blends, and PO loadings, we aim to understand their effect on PLimC and evaluated the different flame-retardant routes. Our experimental evaluations focused on the thermal properties, flammability, and fire behavior of each system. ATH emerged as the most effective, reducing the effective heat of combustion from 29.3 MJ kg⁻¹ to 18.6 MJ kg⁻¹ and the total heat evolved from 95 to 55 MJ m⁻². It also resulted in an increase in the limiting oxygen index from 17.1 to 26 vol.-% O 2 , along with a UL 94 HB40 rating. The intumescent system also exhibited considerable flame retardancy, highlighting the similarity of PLimC’s fire behavior to that of PO rather than PC. .

Polymer Degradation and StabilityVol. 242
Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Translating flame retardant strategies: Analogy from polyolefins and bisphenol a polycarbonates to poly(limonene carbonate) · Polymer Degradation and Stability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS