Grazing Management for Livestock, Free-Roaming Horses and Burros, and Resilience

Grazing management avoids overgrazing by allocating forage for livestock on the basis of animal unit months and managing wild and free-roaming horses (Equus caballus) and burros (E. asinus) to achieve and maintain an appropriate management level (AML) for each herd. Riparian green forage and water attracts cattle (Bos taurus) and equids when upland forage is brown. Key species that focus management for resilience to weather variation, fire, and floods are preferred forage plants for cattle and horses. They include riparian stabilizers such as densely rooted sedges and deep-rooted perennial grasses in sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) and many other rangeland types. As riparian areas became recognized as important habitats for wildlife and central focus areas for hydrologic processes, growing-season-long continuous grazing or too much grazing when only riparian forage is still green and growing became recognized as often debilitating to riparian functions. Continuous growing-season-long grazing also often impairs upland resilience. Without management of animal location and grazing strategies to provide periods of recovery from grazing, stocking rates must be more conservative for resilience of riparian and upland ecosystems. Human movement of livestock to control impact on plants from high intensity or repeated grazing, or to enable recovery from grazing, meets objectives across many rangelands. This movement can be facilitated by virtual fencing and/or stockmanship and facilitates soil organic carbon storage. Humans moving wild and free-roaming horses and burros (WFRHBs) is not currently viewed as an option under the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act. The 1971 Act defines AML as “thriving natural ecological balance and multiple use relationship in that area.” This is now clarified by land health standards for livestock and WFRHBs. Appropriate management levels were set before riparian and other land health standards were considered essential. Many herd management areas may now require downward adjustment of AML.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26077/fd7c-a841
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grazing Management for Livestock, Free-Roaming Horses and Burros, and Resilience

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Microbial infections and disease research
article

Grazing Management for Livestock, Free-Roaming Horses and Burros, and Resilience

article en

Abstract

Grazing management avoids overgrazing by allocating forage for livestock on the basis of animal unit months and managing wild and free-roaming horses (Equus caballus) and burros (E. asinus) to achieve and maintain an appropriate management level (AML) for each herd. Riparian green forage and water attracts cattle (Bos taurus) and equids when upland forage is brown. Key species that focus management for resilience to weather variation, fire, and floods are preferred forage plants for cattle and horses. They include riparian stabilizers such as densely rooted sedges and deep-rooted perennial grasses in sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) and many other rangeland types. As riparian areas became recognized as important habitats for wildlife and central focus areas for hydrologic processes, growing-season-long continuous grazing or too much grazing when only riparian forage is still green and growing became recognized as often debilitating to riparian functions. Continuous growing-season-long grazing also often impairs upland resilience. Without management of animal location and grazing strategies to provide periods of recovery from grazing, stocking rates must be more conservative for resilience of riparian and upland ecosystems. Human movement of livestock to control impact on plants from high intensity or repeated grazing, or to enable recovery from grazing, meets objectives across many rangelands. This movement can be facilitated by virtual fencing and/or stockmanship and facilitates soil organic carbon storage. Humans moving wild and free-roaming horses and burros (WFRHBs) is not currently viewed as an option under the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act. The 1971 Act defines AML as “thriving natural ecological balance and multiple use relationship in that area.” This is now clarified by land health standards for livestock and WFRHBs. Appropriate management levels were set before riparian and other land health standards were considered essential. Many herd management areas may now require downward adjustment of AML.

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.