COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EMBEDDING MODELS FOR MATCHING QUESTIONS AND CONTEXTS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of modern embedding models for matching questions and contexts in the Kazakh language, within the framework of semantic search and question-answering (QA) systems. The study is based on the open dataset Kundyzka/informatics_kaz, which contains approximately 7,700 question–context pairs covering key concepts in computer science. The analysis focuses on comparing the traditional TF-IDF method with state-of-the-art multilingual models, including mMiniLM, LaBSE, Alibaba GTE-multilingual-base, intfloat/multilingual-e5-small, and Snowflake Arctic-Embed v2.0. The evaluation metrics used are Accuracy@1, Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR), and ROC AUC. The zero-shot experiments demonstrate that embedding-based models significantly outperform TF-IDF, achieving Accuracy@1 in the range of 0.59–0.63, whereas the baseline method yields 0.50. Moreover, visualization results using t-SNE indicate that modern models are able to cluster semantically related questions and contexts more closely, which positively affects the quality of ranking. Among the models considered, Alibaba GTE and Snowflake Arctic-Embed v2.0 achieved the best results, confirming their relevance for developing automatic question-answering systems in educational AI applications. This study highlights that even without fine-tuning on Kazakh data, pretrained multilingual models can substantially enhance semantic matching quality, offering promising prospects for their use in educational systems and other information services.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
КазУТБ
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58805/kazutb.v.3.28-987
Primary Topic
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EMBEDDING MODELS FOR MATCHING QUESTIONS AND CONTEXTS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE

КазУТБ
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EMBEDDING MODELS FOR MATCHING QUESTIONS AND CONTEXTS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of modern embedding models for matching questions and contexts in the Kazakh language, within the framework of semantic search and question-answering (QA) systems. The study is based on the open dataset Kundyzka/informatics_kaz, which contains approximately 7,700 question–context pairs covering key concepts in computer science. The analysis focuses on comparing the traditional TF-IDF method with state-of-the-art multilingual models, including mMiniLM, LaBSE, Alibaba GTE-multilingual-base, intfloat/multilingual-e5-small, and Snowflake Arctic-Embed v2.0. The evaluation metrics used are Accuracy@1, Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR), and ROC AUC. The zero-shot experiments demonstrate that embedding-based models significantly outperform TF-IDF, achieving Accuracy@1 in the range of 0.59–0.63, whereas the baseline method yields 0.50. Moreover, visualization results using t-SNE indicate that modern models are able to cluster semantically related questions and contexts more closely, which positively affects the quality of ranking. Among the models considered, Alibaba GTE and Snowflake Arctic-Embed v2.0 achieved the best results, confirming their relevance for developing automatic question-answering systems in educational AI applications. This study highlights that even without fine-tuning on Kazakh data, pretrained multilingual models can substantially enhance semantic matching quality, offering promising prospects for their use in educational systems and other information services.

КазУТБVol. 3(28)
Tokyo Polytechnic University (JP), Astana Medical University (KZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EMBEDDING MODELS FOR MATCHING QUESTIONS AND CONTEXTS IN THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE · КазУТБ (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS