Numbers unnerve: Exploring mathematics anxiety among college students in rural academia

Mathematics anxiety is a complex psychological phenomenon that hinders students’ ability to perform, engage, and persist in mathematics-related tasks. This study aimed to assess the levels of mathematics anxiety among college students and determine whether significant differences exist based on their demographic profiles, specifically gender, age, and career path. Grounded in a descriptive-correlational research design, the study surveyed students enrolled in a state university using the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS-30), a standardized instrument designed to measure dimensions of anxiety, including test-related anxiety, academic and classroom activity anxiety, everyday application anxiety, and social and performance anxiety. A total of respondents were selected through stratified random sampling to ensure equitable representation across groups. Descriptive statistics were employed to determine the extent of students’ anxiety, while ANOVA was utilized to test the significance of differences across demographic categories. Results indicated that students generally experience moderate levels of mathematics anxiety across most domains, with the highest anxiety linked to test-related situations and the lowest in everyday mathematical applications. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed in mathematics anxiety when grouped by gender, age, and career path, suggesting that personal and academic contexts may shape students’ emotional and cognitive responses to mathematics. These findings imply that mathematics anxiety is not a one-size-fits-all issue; rather, it is shaped by situational and identity-related factors that influence how students perceive and perform in mathematical contexts. The study’s implications suggest a need for greater awareness among educators and institutions regarding the varied sources and manifestations of mathematics anxiety. Recognizing that demographic variables influence anxiety levels can inform more inclusive pedagogical strategies and student-centered learning environments. In conclusion, while mathematics anxiety remains a persistent challenge in education, understanding its contextual and demographic underpinnings provides a foundation for targeted interventions and support systems. Future research is encouraged to explore longitudinal patterns of mathematics anxiety and evaluate the effectiveness of tailored instructional approaches in reducing anxiety and improving student outcomes across diverse populations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026001
Primary Topic
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numbers unnerve: Exploring mathematics anxiety among college students in rural academia

Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
article

Numbers unnerve: Exploring mathematics anxiety among college students in rural academia

article en

Abstract

Mathematics anxiety is a complex psychological phenomenon that hinders students’ ability to perform, engage, and persist in mathematics-related tasks. This study aimed to assess the levels of mathematics anxiety among college students and determine whether significant differences exist based on their demographic profiles, specifically gender, age, and career path. Grounded in a descriptive-correlational research design, the study surveyed students enrolled in a state university using the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS-30), a standardized instrument designed to measure dimensions of anxiety, including test-related anxiety, academic and classroom activity anxiety, everyday application anxiety, and social and performance anxiety. A total of respondents were selected through stratified random sampling to ensure equitable representation across groups. Descriptive statistics were employed to determine the extent of students’ anxiety, while ANOVA was utilized to test the significance of differences across demographic categories. Results indicated that students generally experience moderate levels of mathematics anxiety across most domains, with the highest anxiety linked to test-related situations and the lowest in everyday mathematical applications. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed in mathematics anxiety when grouped by gender, age, and career path, suggesting that personal and academic contexts may shape students’ emotional and cognitive responses to mathematics. These findings imply that mathematics anxiety is not a one-size-fits-all issue; rather, it is shaped by situational and identity-related factors that influence how students perceive and perform in mathematical contexts. The study’s implications suggest a need for greater awareness among educators and institutions regarding the varied sources and manifestations of mathematics anxiety. Recognizing that demographic variables influence anxiety levels can inform more inclusive pedagogical strategies and student-centered learning environments. In conclusion, while mathematics anxiety remains a persistent challenge in education, understanding its contextual and demographic underpinnings provides a foundation for targeted interventions and support systems. Future research is encouraged to explore longitudinal patterns of mathematics anxiety and evaluate the effectiveness of tailored instructional approaches in reducing anxiety and improving student outcomes across diverse populations.

Multidisciplinary Science JournalVol. 8(2)
University of Southern Mindanao (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.