Current challenges and future directions for institutional repositories: A systematic literature review. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Abstract Institutional repositories (IRs) are essential in advancing Open Access and facilitating the dissemination of scholarly work. This systematic review examines the challenges faced by IRs in areas such as strategic alignment, content acquisition, funding, staffing, quality assurance, and technology. The review identifies recurring challenges. Strategic issues arise from the interaction between IRs, research organizations, and funders. Professionalization challenges encompass staffing, governance, and collaboration between libraries and IT departments. Funding continues to be a global issue, often tied to institutional resources and policy developments. Technological challenges include adapting to evolving tools while managing limited resources. Concerns related to content quality and copyright affect IR operations and researcher engagement. Usage challenges revolve around raising the awareness of researchers, understanding the role of IRs, and improving engagement through effective marketing and metrics. Key findings underscore the importance of strategic integration with institutional goals and funders' policies, professionalization and technological readiness, securing consistent funding, and addressing challenges in content acquisition, rights management, and researcher participation. This study contributes to the broader discourse on strengthening IRs as critical components of scholarly communication within the Open Science ecosystem.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70016
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current challenges and future directions for institutional repositories: A systematic literature review. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

3 citations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
5.25
article

Current challenges and future directions for institutional repositories: A systematic literature review. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Institutional repositories (IRs) are essential in advancing Open Access and facilitating the dissemination of scholarly work. This systematic review examines the challenges faced by IRs in areas such as strategic alignment, content acquisition, funding, staffing, quality assurance, and technology. The review identifies recurring challenges. Strategic issues arise from the interaction between IRs, research organizations, and funders. Professionalization challenges encompass staffing, governance, and collaboration between libraries and IT departments. Funding continues to be a global issue, often tied to institutional resources and policy developments. Technological challenges include adapting to evolving tools while managing limited resources. Concerns related to content quality and copyright affect IR operations and researcher engagement. Usage challenges revolve around raising the awareness of researchers, understanding the role of IRs, and improving engagement through effective marketing and metrics. Key findings underscore the importance of strategic integration with institutional goals and funders' policies, professionalization and technological readiness, securing consistent funding, and addressing challenges in content acquisition, rights management, and researcher participation. This study contributes to the broader discourse on strengthening IRs as critical components of scholarly communication within the Open Science ecosystem.

Journal of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 77(1)
Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.