Compound Wet/Windy Extremes in Australian Observational and Reanalysis Datasets

Abstract The co-occurrence of extreme rain with extreme wind can result in enhanced impacts, and there is interest in understanding their occurrence, drivers, and potential changes. These compound events are frequently identified based on the co-occurrence of values above a locally defined extreme of the distribution, allowing them to be easily translated between datasets. In this study, we instead use consistent, impact-informed thresholds for daily maximum hourly rainfall and daily maximum wind gusts based on hourly station data from Australia, to better identify extreme events more likely to be associated with damaging impacts. Using this dataset, we evaluate the ability of three reanalyses with different spatial resolutions to identify wet/windy compound events and find that the global 0.25° ERA5 reanalysis underestimates the frequency of wet/windy compound extremes in tropical regions including those linked to thunderstorm activity when compared to observational data or a 0.04°-resolution regional reanalysis. These results highlight important uncertainties in global analyses and projections of wet/windy extremes when using datasets that do not resolve convective-scale processes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-25-0022.1
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compound Wet/Windy Extremes in Australian Observational and Reanalysis Datasets

Journal of Climate
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
article

Compound Wet/Windy Extremes in Australian Observational and Reanalysis Datasets

article en

Abstract

Abstract The co-occurrence of extreme rain with extreme wind can result in enhanced impacts, and there is interest in understanding their occurrence, drivers, and potential changes. These compound events are frequently identified based on the co-occurrence of values above a locally defined extreme of the distribution, allowing them to be easily translated between datasets. In this study, we instead use consistent, impact-informed thresholds for daily maximum hourly rainfall and daily maximum wind gusts based on hourly station data from Australia, to better identify extreme events more likely to be associated with damaging impacts. Using this dataset, we evaluate the ability of three reanalyses with different spatial resolutions to identify wet/windy compound events and find that the global 0.25° ERA5 reanalysis underestimates the frequency of wet/windy compound extremes in tropical regions including those linked to thunderstorm activity when compared to observational data or a 0.04°-resolution regional reanalysis. These results highlight important uncertainties in global analyses and projections of wet/windy extremes when using datasets that do not resolve convective-scale processes.

Journal of ClimateVol. 38(23)
Bureau of Meteorology (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Collaboration for Australian Weather and Climate Research (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.