Environmental Governance Pressure and the Co-Benefit of Carbon Emissions Reduction: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment on 2012 Air Standards

Achieving carbon emission reduction synergy is vital for green economic transformation. This study examines whether environmental governance pressure promotes such synergy, simultaneously driving carbon reduction and pollution control. Leveraging the 2012 Ambient Air Quality Standard as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a continuous difference-in-differences (DID) method on 250 prefecture-level cities from 2009 to 2022. Our findings reveal that increased environmental governance pressure significantly reduces both the total amount and intensity of carbon emissions, demonstrating a clear synergistic effect. This synergy is positively correlated with reductions in major air pollutants (e.g., SO2 and NOx), indicating that pressure curbs both the total amount and intensity of carbon emissions. Mechanistic analysis shows that this pressure primarily curtails carbon emissions by fostering green innovation and accelerating cleaner energy transitions, with no ‘green paradox’. It also promotes low-carbon industrial restructuring while reducing reliance on end-of-pipe pollution management. Heterogeneity analysis indicates stronger synergistic effects in regions with lower emission reduction costs (e.g., western China, less developed industrial bases). We recommend robust central government environmental regulation policies to amplify local governance pressure, strengthen carbon reduction synergy, and facilitate continuous green development.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198863
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Governance Pressure and the Co-Benefit of Carbon Emissions Reduction: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment on 2012 Air Standards

Sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Environmental Governance Pressure and the Co-Benefit of Carbon Emissions Reduction: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment on 2012 Air Standards

article en

Abstract

Achieving carbon emission reduction synergy is vital for green economic transformation. This study examines whether environmental governance pressure promotes such synergy, simultaneously driving carbon reduction and pollution control. Leveraging the 2012 Ambient Air Quality Standard as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a continuous difference-in-differences (DID) method on 250 prefecture-level cities from 2009 to 2022. Our findings reveal that increased environmental governance pressure significantly reduces both the total amount and intensity of carbon emissions, demonstrating a clear synergistic effect. This synergy is positively correlated with reductions in major air pollutants (e.g., SO2 and NOx), indicating that pressure curbs both the total amount and intensity of carbon emissions. Mechanistic analysis shows that this pressure primarily curtails carbon emissions by fostering green innovation and accelerating cleaner energy transitions, with no ‘green paradox’. It also promotes low-carbon industrial restructuring while reducing reliance on end-of-pipe pollution management. Heterogeneity analysis indicates stronger synergistic effects in regions with lower emission reduction costs (e.g., western China, less developed industrial bases). We recommend robust central government environmental regulation policies to amplify local governance pressure, strengthen carbon reduction synergy, and facilitate continuous green development.

SustainabilityVol. 17(19)
Chengdu University of Technology (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.