Trustworthy AI in numerics: On verification algorithms for neural network-based PDE solvers

We present new algorithms for a posteriori verification of neural networks (NNs) approximating solutions to PDEs. These verification algorithms compute accurate estimates of $L^p$ norms of NNs and their derivatives. When combined with residual bounds for specific PDEs, the algorithms provide guarantees of $\eps$-accuracy (in a suitable norm) with respect to the true, but unknown, solution of the PDE -- for arbitrary $\eps >0$. In particular, if the NN fails to meet the desired accuracy, our algorithms will detect that and reject it, whereas any NN that passes the verification algorithms is certified to be $\eps$-accurate. This framework enables trustworthy algorithms for NN-based PDE solvers, regardless of how the NN is initially computed. Such a posteriori verification is essential, since a priori error bounds in general cannot guarantee the accuracy of computed solutions, due to algorithmic undecidability of the optimization problems used to train NNs.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-09-30
Primary Topic
Fungal and yeast genetics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trustworthy AI in numerics: On verification algorithms for neural network-based PDE solvers

ArXiv.org
Fungal and yeast genetics research
article

Trustworthy AI in numerics: On verification algorithms for neural network-based PDE solvers

article en

Abstract

We present new algorithms for a posteriori verification of neural networks (NNs) approximating solutions to PDEs. These verification algorithms compute accurate estimates of $L^p$ norms of NNs and their derivatives. When combined with residual bounds for specific PDEs, the algorithms provide guarantees of $\eps$-accuracy (in a suitable norm) with respect to the true, but unknown, solution of the PDE -- for arbitrary $\eps >0$. In particular, if the NN fails to meet the desired accuracy, our algorithms will detect that and reject it, whereas any NN that passes the verification algorithms is certified to be $\eps$-accurate. This framework enables trustworthy algorithms for NN-based PDE solvers, regardless of how the NN is initially computed. Such a posteriori verification is essential, since a priori error bounds in general cannot guarantee the accuracy of computed solutions, due to algorithmic undecidability of the optimization problems used to train NNs.

ArXiv.org
Universitetet i Oslo
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Fungal and yeast genetics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trustworthy AI in numerics: On verification algorithms for neural network-based PDE solvers · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS