Decision-making process in game sports: what do top-level players think of current research?

Introduction: Excellent performance in game sports is largely determined by a functional decision-making process which integrates different perceptual-cognitive skills. This paper aims to bridge empirical and practical knowledge by exploring top-level players' subjective experiences in decision making. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was developed and informed by existing decision-making literature including three categories (i.e., gaze behavior, information integration, and decision determinants). Each Switzerland's most successful male and female player from five different game sports (i.e., beach volleyball, floorball, handball, ice hockey, and soccer) participated in single interviews, focusing different aspects within each of the three categories. Verbal data were analyzed using a deductive thematic analysis after which top-level players' perspective was compared against the selected theoretical concepts and empirical findings. Results: The data analysis showed that top-level players use gaze anchor and foveal spot for peripheral vision, anticipate based on a weighted combination of kinematic and different contextual information, and decide predominantly intuitively by applying if-then automatism. Discussion: The present findings reflect well-examined factors of the decision-making process and uncover specifics relevant to top-level players but underrepresented in the literature such as decisional relevance when using peripheral vision, or tactical strategies influencing decisions. Therefore, our results provide player-perspective information underlying the decision-making process in complex game situations as well as valuable recommendations for applied practices.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/91544
Primary Topic
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-making process in game sports: what do top-level players think of current research?

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
article

Decision-making process in game sports: what do top-level players think of current research?

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Excellent performance in game sports is largely determined by a functional decision-making process which integrates different perceptual-cognitive skills. This paper aims to bridge empirical and practical knowledge by exploring top-level players' subjective experiences in decision making. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was developed and informed by existing decision-making literature including three categories (i.e., gaze behavior, information integration, and decision determinants). Each Switzerland's most successful male and female player from five different game sports (i.e., beach volleyball, floorball, handball, ice hockey, and soccer) participated in single interviews, focusing different aspects within each of the three categories. Verbal data were analyzed using a deductive thematic analysis after which top-level players' perspective was compared against the selected theoretical concepts and empirical findings. Results: The data analysis showed that top-level players use gaze anchor and foveal spot for peripheral vision, anticipate based on a weighted combination of kinematic and different contextual information, and decide predominantly intuitively by applying if-then automatism. Discussion: The present findings reflect well-examined factors of the decision-making process and uncover specifics relevant to top-level players but underrepresented in the literature such as decisional relevance when using peripheral vision, or tactical strategies influencing decisions. Therefore, our results provide player-perspective information underlying the decision-making process in complex game situations as well as valuable recommendations for applied practices.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
English Institute of Sport (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.