Is Urine Source Separation the Environmentally Preferred Option for Wastewater Management? Insights from a Life Cycle Assessment Study

This study evaluates the environmental impact of hybrid wastewater treatment systems, which combine decentralized urine treatment with a highly efficient centralized WWTP with low nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and electricity use. The comparison is made against the impact of the same centralized WWTP treating mixed wastewater. The results show that the hybrid scenarios showed a lower impact than the baseline in marine, freshwater eutrophication and marine, freshwater ecotoxicity. However, all the hybrid scenarios presented a higher global warming impact than the baseline scenario. A sensitivity analysis on direct N2O emissions and centralized WWTP electricity use shows that while urine source separation is not preferred to a highly efficient WWTP, it can be used to improve the global warming impact of less efficient WWTPs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17243731
Primary Topic
Bone and Dental Protein Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Urine Source Separation the Environmentally Preferred Option for Wastewater Management? Insights from a Life Cycle Assessment Study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bone and Dental Protein Studies
article

Is Urine Source Separation the Environmentally Preferred Option for Wastewater Management? Insights from a Life Cycle Assessment Study

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental impact of hybrid wastewater treatment systems, which combine decentralized urine treatment with a highly efficient centralized WWTP with low nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and electricity use. The comparison is made against the impact of the same centralized WWTP treating mixed wastewater. The results show that the hybrid scenarios showed a lower impact than the baseline in marine, freshwater eutrophication and marine, freshwater ecotoxicity. However, all the hybrid scenarios presented a higher global warming impact than the baseline scenario. A sensitivity analysis on direct N2O emissions and centralized WWTP electricity use shows that while urine source separation is not preferred to a highly efficient WWTP, it can be used to improve the global warming impact of less efficient WWTPs.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Antwerp (BE), ETH Zurich (CH), Centre for Advanced Process Technology for Urban Resource Recovery (BE), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH), Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Bone and Dental Protein Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.