Compatibilidades y tensiones entre modelos de subjetividad: ADL, Neurodinámica, Psicoinmunoneuroendocrinología y Teoría de la Subjetividad Fractal

This paper presents a comparative analysis of four contemporary models that approach subjectivity from different registers: the David Liberman Algorithm (ADL), Neurodynamics, Psychoneuroendocrinoimmunology (PINE), and the Theory of Fractal Subjectivity (TSF). The ADL provides a linear and categorical symbolic coding procedure, Neurodynamics conceives the brain as a nonlinear dynamic system, PINE investigates the interplay between psychological and physiological processes, and the TSF proposes a formal fractal model articulating verbal trajectories, attractors, and bifurcations. Through tables and visual representations, affinities, complementarities, and tensions among these models are systematized, showing that none is sufficient to account for the full complexity of subjectivity. It is argued that TSF can function as a conceptual and methodological bridge, capable of integrating symbolic, neuronal, and physiological registers within a transdisciplinary framework.