Psychological Impact of Flood of July, 2025 on Farmers: A Community Psychology Study in Patna District
The present study titled “Psychological Impact of Flood of July 2025 on Farmers: A Community Psychology Study in Patna District” investigates the mental health consequences of a catastrophic flood among a vulnerable agrarian population. The primary objective was to assess levels of psychological distress, coping mechanisms, stigma, social support, and treatment adherence among flood-affected farmers. A mixed-method design was employed, combining quantitative measures with qualitative interviews. Data were collected from 125 randomly selected farmers (62 males, 63 females) using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) for distress, the Brief COPE Inventory for coping strategies, and semi-structured interviews for contextual insights. Independent sample t-tests were performed to compare psychological distress across demographic groups, including male vs. female farmers, rural vs. peri-urban residents, and supported vs. unsupported participants. Results indicated elevated distress levels (M = 25.62), with both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies coexisting. -based comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences in distress (t = –0.393, p = 0.695), though qualitative findings suggested women reported more anxiety around family safety while men emphasized economic losses. Access to social and community support significantly buffered psychological outcomes and improved treatment adherence. The study highlights the importance of integrating psychosocial care into disaster management, with implications for clinical psychology practice and TB management programs in rural India. Strengthening resilience through community-based interventions and reducing stigma are critical for long-term recovery.
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17249726
- Primary Topic
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00