Factors contributing to the unsuccessful weaning of COVID-19 patients, from invasive mechanical ventilation: A systematic review

ABSTRACT Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 experience a higher burden during the weaning process, with lower rates of successful extubation compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Additionally, there is an increased need for prolonged respiratory support and longer stays in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Aim: This systematic review aims to investigate and identify the main factors contributing to unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19, in order to support clinical decision-making and improve patient prognosis. Methodology: A systematic search of the international literature was conducted using the electronic scientific databases PubMed and Scopus. The search was carried out in English, and primary studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included. Results: Through the search strategy, a total of 1,523 articles were retrieved, of which 9 primary studies were included and evaluated in the present systematic review. All included studies explore and address the presence of factors contributing to unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients, in comparison with the respective control groups. Conclusions: Unsuccessful weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 reflects a set of interacting factors related both to patient-specific characteristics and to parameters concerning the disease itself, mechanical ventilation, and the required clinical interventions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17243544
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors contributing to the unsuccessful weaning of COVID-19 patients, from invasive mechanical ventilation: A systematic review

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Factors contributing to the unsuccessful weaning of COVID-19 patients, from invasive mechanical ventilation: A systematic review

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 experience a higher burden during the weaning process, with lower rates of successful extubation compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Additionally, there is an increased need for prolonged respiratory support and longer stays in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Aim: This systematic review aims to investigate and identify the main factors contributing to unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19, in order to support clinical decision-making and improve patient prognosis. Methodology: A systematic search of the international literature was conducted using the electronic scientific databases PubMed and Scopus. The search was carried out in English, and primary studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included. Results: Through the search strategy, a total of 1,523 articles were retrieved, of which 9 primary studies were included and evaluated in the present systematic review. All included studies explore and address the presence of factors contributing to unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients, in comparison with the respective control groups. Conclusions: Unsuccessful weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 reflects a set of interacting factors related both to patient-specific characteristics and to parameters concerning the disease itself, mechanical ventilation, and the required clinical interventions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
KAT General Hospital of Attica (GR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.