Comparison of the Witness’s and the Defendant’s Testimonies in Legal Discourse

The Georgian criminal procedure system has existed for several years. Initially, the Criminal Procedure Code of February 20, 1998 attempted to regulate the criminal procedure; however, taking into account contemporary developments, the Criminal Procedure Code of 2009 - which remains in force – was adopted to address the criminal justice issues prevailing at the time. Since the criminal procedure is not static, over time, alongside new challenges, it has been shaped by the decisions of the legislative body and the Constitutional Court. It is worth exploring whether the Judgment of the Plenum of the Constitutional Court of Georgia dated December 28, 2021 imposed limitations on the defendant’s internationally recognized right against self-incrimination, and whether it effectively equated the defendant with a standard witness. This article specifically addresses the common and distinguishing features of the procedural status of the defendant and the witness, and the peculiarities of their testimonies.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Witness’s and the Defendant’s Testimonies in Legal Discourse

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Fecal contamination and water quality
article

Comparison of the Witness’s and the Defendant’s Testimonies in Legal Discourse

article en

Abstract

The Georgian criminal procedure system has existed for several years. Initially, the Criminal Procedure Code of February 20, 1998 attempted to regulate the criminal procedure; however, taking into account contemporary developments, the Criminal Procedure Code of 2009 - which remains in force – was adopted to address the criminal justice issues prevailing at the time. Since the criminal procedure is not static, over time, alongside new challenges, it has been shaped by the decisions of the legislative body and the Constitutional Court. It is worth exploring whether the Judgment of the Plenum of the Constitutional Court of Georgia dated December 28, 2021 imposed limitations on the defendant’s internationally recognized right against self-incrimination, and whether it effectively equated the defendant with a standard witness. This article specifically addresses the common and distinguishing features of the procedural status of the defendant and the witness, and the peculiarities of their testimonies.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Fecal contamination and water quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.