Navigating Challenges in Shared Decision-Making in Danish Patient Care

Patient-centered care and patient choice are reshaping management practices in the Danish public healthcare sector. Patients are becoming more involved in their treatment and assuming greater control over their healthcare decisions. This transformation redefines relationships among patients, professionals, and the state. It raises important inquiries into how healthcare professionals navigate their new roles and responsibilities within this changing landscape. In this paper, we interviewed ten health professionals to delineate how they handle user involvement in daily clinical practice. Utilizing a sociology of profession framework for thematic analysis, our research revealed the disparities between the ideal and the actual implementation of patient-centered care. It highlighted the challenges healthcare professionals encounter in integrating shared decision-making practices and ensuring patients are adequately informed. We conclude that uncertainties regarding responsibility allocation and the boundaries of healthcare professional involvement often overshadow shared responsibility between healthcare professionals and patients.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access Journals at Oslo Metropolitan University (Oslo Metropolitan University)
Published
2025-09-18
Primary Topic
Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Challenges in Shared Decision-Making in Danish Patient Care

Open Access Journals at Oslo Metropolitan University (Oslo Metropolitan University)
Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
article

Navigating Challenges in Shared Decision-Making in Danish Patient Care

article en

Abstract

Patient-centered care and patient choice are reshaping management practices in the Danish public healthcare sector. Patients are becoming more involved in their treatment and assuming greater control over their healthcare decisions. This transformation redefines relationships among patients, professionals, and the state. It raises important inquiries into how healthcare professionals navigate their new roles and responsibilities within this changing landscape. In this paper, we interviewed ten health professionals to delineate how they handle user involvement in daily clinical practice. Utilizing a sociology of profession framework for thematic analysis, our research revealed the disparities between the ideal and the actual implementation of patient-centered care. It highlighted the challenges healthcare professionals encounter in integrating shared decision-making practices and ensuring patients are adequately informed. We conclude that uncertainties regarding responsibility allocation and the boundaries of healthcare professional involvement often overshadow shared responsibility between healthcare professionals and patients.

Open Access Journals at Oslo Metropolitan University (Oslo Metropolitan University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating Challenges in Shared Decision-Making in Danish Patient Care · Open Access Journals at Oslo Metropolitan University (Oslo Metropolitan University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS