Acquisition of Unlabeled Dataset for Human Activity Recognition

In the paper, we recorded the device’s IMU sensors in the setting of Human Activity Recognition task for the purpose of building the pretrained model by self-supervised learner. To use the data for self-supervised learning, we collected it without labels. Therefore, unlike typical human activity recognition datasets, no labels were assigned, and it is important to note this distinction. As a result, the cost of label collection was minimized, but the time required for data collection remained the same, even though the data was unlabeled. On the other hand, since the data was unlabeled, there was no need to go through the complex process of assigning labels or inputting labels through a smartphone, which meant that data collection could be carried out without any prior knowledge of human activity recognition. The dataset consists of data from three subjects, totaling 228 hours. We performed self-supervised learning on the model and evaluated its performance using other IMU datasets. While this data was originally collected for human activity recognition, we anticipate that the use of unlabeled data in self-supervised learning will become more common in the future. In such cases, this dataset should be suitable for tasks that use unlabeled IMU data.

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-20
Primary Topic
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acquisition of Unlabeled Dataset for Human Activity Recognition

Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
article

Acquisition of Unlabeled Dataset for Human Activity Recognition

article en

Abstract

In the paper, we recorded the device’s IMU sensors in the setting of Human Activity Recognition task for the purpose of building the pretrained model by self-supervised learner. To use the data for self-supervised learning, we collected it without labels. Therefore, unlike typical human activity recognition datasets, no labels were assigned, and it is important to note this distinction. As a result, the cost of label collection was minimized, but the time required for data collection remained the same, even though the data was unlabeled. On the other hand, since the data was unlabeled, there was no need to go through the complex process of assigning labels or inputting labels through a smartphone, which meant that data collection could be carried out without any prior knowledge of human activity recognition. The dataset consists of data from three subjects, totaling 228 hours. We performed self-supervised learning on the model and evaluated its performance using other IMU datasets. While this data was originally collected for human activity recognition, we anticipate that the use of unlabeled data in self-supervised learning will become more common in the future. In such cases, this dataset should be suitable for tasks that use unlabeled IMU data.

Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.