On random bipartite graphs evolving by degrees

In this paper, we study a bipartite analogue of the `random graphs evolving by degrees' process. We are given a bipartitioned set of vertices $V$ into two disjoint parts ${L}$ and ${R}$ and possibly unequal positive constants $α$ and $β$. The graph evolves starting from $B_0$, the empty graph (with only isolated vertices). Given $B_t$, a non-adjacent vertex pair $u \in {L}, v \in {R}$ is sampled with probability proportional to $(d_u(t)+α)(d_v(t)+β)$, and the edge $\{u,v\}$ is included to $B_t$ to form $B_{t+1}$, where $d_u(t)$ is the degree of $u$ in $B_t$. For this model, we establish the threshold for the appearance of a giant component, the connectivity threshold for the associated multigraph variant, and provide a superlinear lower bound on the connectivity threshold for the simple graph case. For the proof of the giant component result, our methods involve setting up an exact coupling of the multigraph case with a bipartite configuration model and using existing results on the giant of bipartite configuration models. This is an adaptation of the technique of Janson and Warnke (Ann. Appl. Probab. 2021) where they treat the unipartite case similarly. For the connectivity results, we first set up a formula for the exact probability of the occurrence of certain connectivity events in the multigraph process, which is interesting in its own right. To then derive the connectedness threshold, we analyze a particular case of it à la Pittel (Adv. Math. 2010). For the superlinear connectivity lower bound in the simple graph case, we establish and use a tail bound on the number of isolated vertices in the multigraph process, together with a change of measure statement to go from the multi to the simple graph process.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-09-28
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On random bipartite graphs evolving by degrees

ArXiv.org
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

On random bipartite graphs evolving by degrees

article en

Abstract

In this paper, we study a bipartite analogue of the `random graphs evolving by degrees' process. We are given a bipartitioned set of vertices $V$ into two disjoint parts ${L}$ and ${R}$ and possibly unequal positive constants $α$ and $β$. The graph evolves starting from $B_0$, the empty graph (with only isolated vertices). Given $B_t$, a non-adjacent vertex pair $u \in {L}, v \in {R}$ is sampled with probability proportional to $(d_u(t)+α)(d_v(t)+β)$, and the edge $\{u,v\}$ is included to $B_t$ to form $B_{t+1}$, where $d_u(t)$ is the degree of $u$ in $B_t$. For this model, we establish the threshold for the appearance of a giant component, the connectivity threshold for the associated multigraph variant, and provide a superlinear lower bound on the connectivity threshold for the simple graph case. For the proof of the giant component result, our methods involve setting up an exact coupling of the multigraph case with a bipartite configuration model and using existing results on the giant of bipartite configuration models. This is an adaptation of the technique of Janson and Warnke (Ann. Appl. Probab. 2021) where they treat the unipartite case similarly. For the connectivity results, we first set up a formula for the exact probability of the occurrence of certain connectivity events in the multigraph process, which is interesting in its own right. To then derive the connectedness threshold, we analyze a particular case of it à la Pittel (Adv. Math. 2010). For the superlinear connectivity lower bound in the simple graph case, we establish and use a tail bound on the number of isolated vertices in the multigraph process, together with a change of measure statement to go from the multi to the simple graph process.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.