Advancing Zero-Shot Open-Set Speech Deepfake Source Tracing

We propose a novel zero-shot source tracing framework inspired by advances in speaker verification. Specifically, we adapt the SSL-AASIST system for attack classification, ensuring that the attacks used for training are disjoint from those used to form fingerprint-trial pairs. For backend scoring in attack verification, we explore both zero-shot approaches (cosine similarity and Siamese) and few-shot approaches (MLP and Siamese). Experiments on our recently introduced STOPA dataset suggest that few-shot learning provides advantages in the closed-set scenario, while zero-shot approaches perform better in the open-set scenario. In closed-set trials, few-shot Siamese and MLP achieve equal error rates (EER) of 18.44% and 15.11%, compared to 27.14% for zero-shot cosine scoring. Conversely, in open-set trials, zero-shot cosine scoring reaches 21.70%, outperforming few-shot Siamese and MLP at 27.40% and 22.65%, respectively.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-09-29
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Zero-Shot Open-Set Speech Deepfake Source Tracing

ArXiv.org
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Advancing Zero-Shot Open-Set Speech Deepfake Source Tracing

article en

Abstract

We propose a novel zero-shot source tracing framework inspired by advances in speaker verification. Specifically, we adapt the SSL-AASIST system for attack classification, ensuring that the attacks used for training are disjoint from those used to form fingerprint-trial pairs. For backend scoring in attack verification, we explore both zero-shot approaches (cosine similarity and Siamese) and few-shot approaches (MLP and Siamese). Experiments on our recently introduced STOPA dataset suggest that few-shot learning provides advantages in the closed-set scenario, while zero-shot approaches perform better in the open-set scenario. In closed-set trials, few-shot Siamese and MLP achieve equal error rates (EER) of 18.44% and 15.11%, compared to 27.14% for zero-shot cosine scoring. Conversely, in open-set trials, zero-shot cosine scoring reaches 21.70%, outperforming few-shot Siamese and MLP at 27.40% and 22.65%, respectively.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancing Zero-Shot Open-Set Speech Deepfake Source Tracing · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS