Does meta-analytic evidence support Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder? A commentary and corrected analysis for Beker et al. (2024).

In individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID), a key question is whether individuals in one identity state can access memories formed while being in another identity state. Beker and colleagues (2024) addressed this through a systematic review and four meta-analyses. While the review and two meta-analyses suggested memory transfer between identities, the other two meta-analyses appeared to support inter-identity amnesia. We argue that four systematic errors may explain the conflicting conclusions, including the lack of a control group, inappropriate hypotheses to establish whether amnesia is present, inconsistencies and calculation errors, and problematic reasoning regarding case data versus group-level statistics. In our meta-analyses we corrected for these errors and the results are consistent with the narrative results: both support memory transfer between identities, despite the self-reported inter-identity amnesia in individuals with DID.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f8r2t_v2
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does meta-analytic evidence support Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder? A commentary and corrected analysis for Beker et al. (2024).

Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Does meta-analytic evidence support Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder? A commentary and corrected analysis for Beker et al. (2024).

article en

Abstract

In individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID), a key question is whether individuals in one identity state can access memories formed while being in another identity state. Beker and colleagues (2024) addressed this through a systematic review and four meta-analyses. While the review and two meta-analyses suggested memory transfer between identities, the other two meta-analyses appeared to support inter-identity amnesia. We argue that four systematic errors may explain the conflicting conclusions, including the lack of a control group, inappropriate hypotheses to establish whether amnesia is present, inconsistencies and calculation errors, and problematic reasoning regarding case data versus group-level statistics. In our meta-analyses we corrected for these errors and the results are consistent with the narrative results: both support memory transfer between identities, despite the self-reported inter-identity amnesia in individuals with DID.

University of Arizona (US), Harvard University Press (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.