A Computational Framework for Thought Engineering: PREN Scoring and FBM Intervention for Cognitive and Behavioral Insights

This paper formalizes two core modules in Thought Engineering: the PREN model for scoring the structural impact of questions and stimuli, and the FBM (Frame Break Method) for structural intervention. Factor scores, an overall PREN index, explicit intervention conditions, and an effect metric are defined, with visualizations enabling otherwise invisible cognitive structures to become inspectable. The framework is positioned within psychological research on cognitive framing, metacognition, and behavioral change, providing structured methods to facilitate self-reflection and adaptive decision-making. The scope is restricted to PREN and FBM, leaving other modules (e.g., EME, RQU, PRM) for future integration.

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wfvgz_v1
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Computational Framework for Thought Engineering: PREN Scoring and FBM Intervention for Cognitive and Behavioral Insights

Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

A Computational Framework for Thought Engineering: PREN Scoring and FBM Intervention for Cognitive and Behavioral Insights

article en

Abstract

This paper formalizes two core modules in Thought Engineering: the PREN model for scoring the structural impact of questions and stimuli, and the FBM (Frame Break Method) for structural intervention. Factor scores, an overall PREN index, explicit intervention conditions, and an effect metric are defined, with visualizations enabling otherwise invisible cognitive structures to become inspectable. The framework is positioned within psychological research on cognitive framing, metacognition, and behavioral change, providing structured methods to facilitate self-reflection and adaptive decision-making. The scope is restricted to PREN and FBM, leaving other modules (e.g., EME, RQU, PRM) for future integration.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Computational Framework for Thought Engineering: PREN Scoring and FBM Intervention for Cognitive and Behavioral Insights · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS