The visibility of women scientists in universities’ external communication through social networks

This study investigates the visibility of women scientists in the external communication of universities through social networks, specifically Twitter and Facebook. Using a gender perspective, the research analyses content from Harvard University, the University of Oxford, and the University of Barcelona over a two-month period in early 2022. The analysis, based on UNESCO’s scientific discipline classification, examines both the thematic scope and the engagement generated by posts. Results show that science communication accounts for over 40% of institutional social media activity, with medical and life sciences dominating content. However, a significant gender imbalance emerges: male scientists are more frequently featured as primary sources and protagonists, particularly in research dissemination and interviews, while women are more visible in outreach events and social sciences. This imbalance is both quantitative and qualitative, as men not only appear more often but also occupy higher-authority positions in communication. Posts featuring male scientists also achieve greater engagement metrics (comments, likes, shares). The findings suggest that, despite institutional commitments to gender equality, universities underutilise social networks’ potential to foster balanced visibility of women scientists. Addressing this requires targeted strategies to diversify representation and challenge entrenched gender stereotypes in scientific communication.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30017836
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The visibility of women scientists in universities’ external communication through social networks

Figshare
Online Learning and Analytics
article

The visibility of women scientists in universities’ external communication through social networks

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the visibility of women scientists in the external communication of universities through social networks, specifically Twitter and Facebook. Using a gender perspective, the research analyses content from Harvard University, the University of Oxford, and the University of Barcelona over a two-month period in early 2022. The analysis, based on UNESCO’s scientific discipline classification, examines both the thematic scope and the engagement generated by posts. Results show that science communication accounts for over 40% of institutional social media activity, with medical and life sciences dominating content. However, a significant gender imbalance emerges: male scientists are more frequently featured as primary sources and protagonists, particularly in research dissemination and interviews, while women are more visible in outreach events and social sciences. This imbalance is both quantitative and qualitative, as men not only appear more often but also occupy higher-authority positions in communication. Posts featuring male scientists also achieve greater engagement metrics (comments, likes, shares). The findings suggest that, despite institutional commitments to gender equality, universities underutilise social networks’ potential to foster balanced visibility of women scientists. Addressing this requires targeted strategies to diversify representation and challenge entrenched gender stereotypes in scientific communication.

Figshare
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.