PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN MEDICAL IMAGE RECOGNITION

This paper presents a comparison of the ML models for medical image recognition tasks. Conventional techniques e.g. SVM and Random Forest and also recent deep learning structures e.g. CNNs are analysed. Model accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, inference time and performance are measured, and the models are verified, and benchmark medical imaging datasets are validated to ensure accuracy of the image. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages and the presented methods provide an insight into the applied use of each method in automated medical diagnosis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17242025
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN MEDICAL IMAGE RECOGNITION

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN MEDICAL IMAGE RECOGNITION

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of the ML models for medical image recognition tasks. Conventional techniques e.g. SVM and Random Forest and also recent deep learning structures e.g. CNNs are analysed. Model accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, inference time and performance are measured, and the models are verified, and benchmark medical imaging datasets are validated to ensure accuracy of the image. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages and the presented methods provide an insight into the applied use of each method in automated medical diagnosis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.