Comparative Analysis of Handwritten Urdu Digits Recognition through Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods

This study presents a comparative analysis of Urdu digits recognition using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Decision Trees, KNearest Neighbors (KNN), and the VGG architecture. Evaluating these models on a dataset of handwritten Urdu digits, we assess their performance based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and computational efficiency. The deep learning models, CNN and VGG, leverage convolutional layers to extract spatial features, while RNN explores sequential data applicability. Traditional machine learning methods, Decision Tree and KNN, serve as baselines. Experimental results demonstrate that CNN and VGG significantly outperform the traditional methods in accuracy and robustness, although with higher computational costs and training times. This study underscores the trade-offs between model complexity and performance, providing valuable insights for practitioners and researchers in handwritten digit recognition.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icic63915.2024.11116029
Primary Topic
Fungal and yeast genetics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Handwritten Urdu Digits Recognition through Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods

Fungal and yeast genetics research
article

Comparative Analysis of Handwritten Urdu Digits Recognition through Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods

article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of Urdu digits recognition using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Decision Trees, KNearest Neighbors (KNN), and the VGG architecture. Evaluating these models on a dataset of handwritten Urdu digits, we assess their performance based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and computational efficiency. The deep learning models, CNN and VGG, leverage convolutional layers to extract spatial features, while RNN explores sequential data applicability. Traditional machine learning methods, Decision Tree and KNN, serve as baselines. Experimental results demonstrate that CNN and VGG significantly outperform the traditional methods in accuracy and robustness, although with higher computational costs and training times. This study underscores the trade-offs between model complexity and performance, providing valuable insights for practitioners and researchers in handwritten digit recognition.

University of Management and Technology (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Fungal and yeast genetics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.