Classifying urban commuters by trip chaining behavior in a developing country city

• Four groups of commuters with distinct trip chaining characteristics. • The largest commuter group uses non-motorized modes in complex trip chains. • The smallest group of commuters makes simple trip chains with motorized transport. • Use of transit is typically associated with simple trip chains. • Complex trip chains are influenced by gender, marital status, and land-use mix. The complex urban life has prompted commuters to combine non-work activities with their work trips to save time and money, resulting in commute-based trip chains closely tied to mode choice. Dhaka, one of the world’s most densely populated megacities and the capital of Bangladesh, exhibits the potential for unique trip chaining patterns driven by its complex land use and extensive range of transport options. This study examines the trip chaining behavior of commuters in Dhaka, utilizing Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to categorize them based on their trip chaining and mode use characteristics. The analysis reveals four distinct commuter classes. Class 1 represents simple trip chain makers, traveling without additional stops between home and work, using motorized transport. They typically belong to middle- to high-income households with access to private vehicles. Class 2 is characterized by complex trip chain makers – individuals who combine work and non-work activities – primarily during the journey to home, utilizing motorized vehicles. Females and those from middle- to high-income households tend to fall into this group. Class 3 consists of simple trip chain makers who rely on public transit or non-motorized vehicles. These commuters are mainly low-income males without access to private vehicles. Finally, Class 4 represents complex trip chain makers using non-motorized transport and typically belong to middle-income households with no private vehicle access. The findings offer valuable insights into the complex travel behavior of commuters, aiding the development of effective travel demand management policies, particularly in addressing peak-hour traffic contributed by commuters.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101651
Primary Topic
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classifying urban commuters by trip chaining behavior in a developing country city

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
article

Classifying urban commuters by trip chaining behavior in a developing country city

article en

Abstract

• Four groups of commuters with distinct trip chaining characteristics. • The largest commuter group uses non-motorized modes in complex trip chains. • The smallest group of commuters makes simple trip chains with motorized transport. • Use of transit is typically associated with simple trip chains. • Complex trip chains are influenced by gender, marital status, and land-use mix. The complex urban life has prompted commuters to combine non-work activities with their work trips to save time and money, resulting in commute-based trip chains closely tied to mode choice. Dhaka, one of the world’s most densely populated megacities and the capital of Bangladesh, exhibits the potential for unique trip chaining patterns driven by its complex land use and extensive range of transport options. This study examines the trip chaining behavior of commuters in Dhaka, utilizing Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to categorize them based on their trip chaining and mode use characteristics. The analysis reveals four distinct commuter classes. Class 1 represents simple trip chain makers, traveling without additional stops between home and work, using motorized transport. They typically belong to middle- to high-income households with access to private vehicles. Class 2 is characterized by complex trip chain makers – individuals who combine work and non-work activities – primarily during the journey to home, utilizing motorized vehicles. Females and those from middle- to high-income households tend to fall into this group. Class 3 consists of simple trip chain makers who rely on public transit or non-motorized vehicles. These commuters are mainly low-income males without access to private vehicles. Finally, Class 4 represents complex trip chain makers using non-motorized transport and typically belong to middle-income households with no private vehicle access. The findings offer valuable insights into the complex travel behavior of commuters, aiding the development of effective travel demand management policies, particularly in addressing peak-hour traffic contributed by commuters.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 34
California Department of Transportation (US), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD), University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.