The contested field of Open Science: a debate through the lens of inclusion

The Open Science (OS) movement has evolved in the last decades, with different actors taking different paths across the various dimensions of the OS concept. Contradictory implementation plans for open access and disparate visions of citizen science co-exist, and are often in conflict at the global scale.

Publication Details

Journal
Front Matter
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59350/mhg0v-aqb66
Primary Topic
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The contested field of Open Science: a debate through the lens of inclusion

Front Matter
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
article

The contested field of Open Science: a debate through the lens of inclusion

article en

Abstract

The Open Science (OS) movement has evolved in the last decades, with different actors taking different paths across the various dimensions of the OS concept. Contradictory implementation plans for open access and disparate visions of citizen science co-exist, and are often in conflict at the global scale.

Front Matter
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The contested field of Open Science: a debate through the lens of inclusion · Front Matter (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS