Modeling Local Search Metaheuristics Using Markov Decision Processes

Local search metaheuristics like tabu search or simulated annealing are popular heuristic optimization algorithms for finding near-optimal solutions for combinatorial optimization problems. However, it is still challenging for researchers and practitioners to analyze their behavior and systematically choose one over a vast set of possible metaheuristics for the particular problem at hand. In this paper, we introduce a theoretical framework based on Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) for analyzing local search metaheuristics. This framework not only helps in providing convergence results for individual algorithms but also provides an explicit characterization of the exploration–exploitation tradeoff and a theory-grounded guidance for practitioners for choosing an appropriate metaheuristic for the problem at hand. We present this framework in detail and show how to apply it in the case of hill climbing and the simulated annealing algorithm, including computational experiments.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18080512
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Local Search Metaheuristics Using Markov Decision Processes

Algorithms
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Modeling Local Search Metaheuristics Using Markov Decision Processes

article en

Abstract

Local search metaheuristics like tabu search or simulated annealing are popular heuristic optimization algorithms for finding near-optimal solutions for combinatorial optimization problems. However, it is still challenging for researchers and practitioners to analyze their behavior and systematically choose one over a vast set of possible metaheuristics for the particular problem at hand. In this paper, we introduce a theoretical framework based on Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) for analyzing local search metaheuristics. This framework not only helps in providing convergence results for individual algorithms but also provides an explicit characterization of the exploration–exploitation tradeoff and a theory-grounded guidance for practitioners for choosing an appropriate metaheuristic for the problem at hand. We present this framework in detail and show how to apply it in the case of hill climbing and the simulated annealing algorithm, including computational experiments.

AlgorithmsVol. 18(8)
IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems (AT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.