The Triple Ethical Tensions of Intelligent Healthcare

While artificial intelligence (AI) significantly enhances medical efficiency, it also raises a series of ethical concerns, including blurred clinical responsibility, imbalanced data governance, and algorithmic bias. This paper examines three major ethical tensions in intelligent healthcare: first, the integration of AI reshapes clinical decision-making structures, leading to ambiguous responsibility allocation and a weakening of physicians' subjectivity; second, algorithm-driven data governance may result in the failure of informed consent and the marginalization of patients' lived experiences; third, regional disparities embedded in technical standards exacerbate health inequalities, with algorithmic discrimination potentially entrenching imbalances in resource distribution. In response, this study proposes ethical reconstruction strategies, including the establishment of shared responsibility frameworks, enhancement of algorithmic transparency, reinforcement of data protection, and optimization of fairness mechanisms, aiming to promote the responsible development of medical AI.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.11.04
Primary Topic
Nigella sativa pharmacological applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Triple Ethical Tensions of Intelligent Healthcare

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Nigella sativa pharmacological applications
article

The Triple Ethical Tensions of Intelligent Healthcare

article en

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) significantly enhances medical efficiency, it also raises a series of ethical concerns, including blurred clinical responsibility, imbalanced data governance, and algorithmic bias. This paper examines three major ethical tensions in intelligent healthcare: first, the integration of AI reshapes clinical decision-making structures, leading to ambiguous responsibility allocation and a weakening of physicians' subjectivity; second, algorithm-driven data governance may result in the failure of informed consent and the marginalization of patients' lived experiences; third, regional disparities embedded in technical standards exacerbate health inequalities, with algorithmic discrimination potentially entrenching imbalances in resource distribution. In response, this study proposes ethical reconstruction strategies, including the establishment of shared responsibility frameworks, enhancement of algorithmic transparency, reinforcement of data protection, and optimization of fairness mechanisms, aiming to promote the responsible development of medical AI.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Zunyi Medical University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Nigella sativa pharmacological applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Triple Ethical Tensions of Intelligent Healthcare · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS