Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Detecting Labor Market Monopoly in Digital Economy

The rapid expansion of platform-based gig work has sparked growing concerns about algorithm-driven wage suppression and the emergence of labor market monopsony. Particularly in ride-hailing and similar sectors, opaque algorithmic mechanisms enable platforms to subtly control labor supply, task allocation, and compensation, potentially exacerbating income inequalities and weakening worker bargaining power. To identify and characterize these hidden forms of algorithmic monopsony, this paper proposes a novel analytical framework integrating Difference-in-Differences (DID) econometrics with K-medoids clustering. We illustrate our methodology using a synthetic ride-hailing dataset, where DID isolates the average causal impact of an algorithmic policy shift on driver earnings. Subsequently, K-medoids clustering reveals distinct subgroups disproportionately affected, highlighting significant wage reductions among part-time and lower-order drivers. Our findings emphasize the need for enhanced regulatory oversight, mandatory algorithmic transparency, and targeted interventions to protect vulnerable worker segments and ensure equitable labor standards in the digital economy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/yac66630.2025.11150206
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Detecting Labor Market Monopoly in Digital Economy

Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Detecting Labor Market Monopoly in Digital Economy

article en

Abstract

The rapid expansion of platform-based gig work has sparked growing concerns about algorithm-driven wage suppression and the emergence of labor market monopsony. Particularly in ride-hailing and similar sectors, opaque algorithmic mechanisms enable platforms to subtly control labor supply, task allocation, and compensation, potentially exacerbating income inequalities and weakening worker bargaining power. To identify and characterize these hidden forms of algorithmic monopsony, this paper proposes a novel analytical framework integrating Difference-in-Differences (DID) econometrics with K-medoids clustering. We illustrate our methodology using a synthetic ride-hailing dataset, where DID isolates the average causal impact of an algorithmic policy shift on driver earnings. Subsequently, K-medoids clustering reveals distinct subgroups disproportionately affected, highlighting significant wage reductions among part-time and lower-order drivers. Our findings emphasize the need for enhanced regulatory oversight, mandatory algorithmic transparency, and targeted interventions to protect vulnerable worker segments and ensure equitable labor standards in the digital economy.

Tongji University (CN), Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.