A Modification Of Bowel Preparation Prior To Intravenous Urography

One hundred (100) adult patients booked to have outpatient intravenous urogram in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Nigeria were allocated into one of two groups taking into cognizance their bowel habits. Group 'A' patients had very sluggish bowel habit (opened bowel once in three or more days) while Group 'B' patients opened bowel at least once in 48 hours. Both groups received the same instructions for bowel preparation except for the laxative Dulcolax (Bisacodyl) which was excluded in Group 'B'. The effectiveness of the bowel preparation in both groups was assessed by awarding scores to their “Control film”. The result showed no significant difference in the degree of faecal shadowing between the groups. Meanwhile 35(70%) of patients in group 'A' experienced some inconveniences as side effects from the laxative. There was no reduction in the number of radiographs taken in either groups therefore the use of a laxative did not decrease radiation dose. In conclusion, the routine use of a laxative for every patient booked for IVU is not justified, a modification of bowel preparation to suit bowel habit is therefore recommended.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82235/wajr.vol11no1.140
Primary Topic
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Modification Of Bowel Preparation Prior To Intravenous Urography

Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
article

A Modification Of Bowel Preparation Prior To Intravenous Urography

article en

Abstract

One hundred (100) adult patients booked to have outpatient intravenous urogram in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Nigeria were allocated into one of two groups taking into cognizance their bowel habits. Group 'A' patients had very sluggish bowel habit (opened bowel once in three or more days) while Group 'B' patients opened bowel at least once in 48 hours. Both groups received the same instructions for bowel preparation except for the laxative Dulcolax (Bisacodyl) which was excluded in Group 'B'. The effectiveness of the bowel preparation in both groups was assessed by awarding scores to their “Control film”. The result showed no significant difference in the degree of faecal shadowing between the groups. Meanwhile 35(70%) of patients in group 'A' experienced some inconveniences as side effects from the laxative. There was no reduction in the number of radiographs taken in either groups therefore the use of a laxative did not decrease radiation dose. In conclusion, the routine use of a laxative for every patient booked for IVU is not justified, a modification of bowel preparation to suit bowel habit is therefore recommended.

Lagos University Teaching Hospital (NG), University of Calabar (NG), University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (NG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.