Rotating Eddy Current Testing: a Probe Optimization Analysis to Improve Test Performance

Rotating Eddy Current (REC) techniques have been widely adopted to improve defect detection capabilities in Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). However, the integration of ferromagnetic structures into REC-based probes remains an underexplored approach to further improve detection sensitivity. This paper presents a numerical analysis investigating the impact of different ferromagnetic structures (i.e. air-cored, ferromagnetic-shielded, ferromagnetic-cored and pot-cored) on the performance of REC probes. Finite element analysis (FEA) simulations were performed with COMSOL Multiphysics ®, evaluating each probe configuration in terms of reaction magnetic flux concentration and defect detectability. The study considered superficial and buried cracks in an aluminium alloy sample, analyzing variations in defect response, in terms of reaction magnetic flux, according to crack size and depth. The results indicate that the optimal probe design depends on defect location: while ferromagnetic-cored structures offer superior performance for surface cracks, pot-cored structures improve the detection of buried defects. These results highlight the potential of ferromagnetic structures adopted in REC methods, suggesting the need for further optimization adapted to the specific inspection scenario.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/metroaerospace64938.2025.11114503
Primary Topic
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rotating Eddy Current Testing: a Probe Optimization Analysis to Improve Test Performance

Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
article

Rotating Eddy Current Testing: a Probe Optimization Analysis to Improve Test Performance

article en

Abstract

Rotating Eddy Current (REC) techniques have been widely adopted to improve defect detection capabilities in Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). However, the integration of ferromagnetic structures into REC-based probes remains an underexplored approach to further improve detection sensitivity. This paper presents a numerical analysis investigating the impact of different ferromagnetic structures (i.e. air-cored, ferromagnetic-shielded, ferromagnetic-cored and pot-cored) on the performance of REC probes. Finite element analysis (FEA) simulations were performed with COMSOL Multiphysics ®, evaluating each probe configuration in terms of reaction magnetic flux concentration and defect detectability. The study considered superficial and buried cracks in an aluminium alloy sample, analyzing variations in defect response, in terms of reaction magnetic flux, according to crack size and depth. The results indicate that the optimal probe design depends on defect location: while ferromagnetic-cored structures offer superior performance for surface cracks, pot-cored structures improve the detection of buried defects. These results highlight the potential of ferromagnetic structures adopted in REC methods, suggesting the need for further optimization adapted to the specific inspection scenario.

Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT), Pegaso University (IT), Mercatorum University (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rotating Eddy Current Testing: a Probe Optimization Analysis to Improve Test Performance · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS