Landschap Philia: The Origins of Human Delight in Landscape Beauty
This paper identifies the various influences of Western aesthetic preferences of landscapes in answer to the question, why do humans find landscapes attractive? A four-level model of influences is proposed, based on the innate or evolutionary influences applicable to all humanity, through the cultural and the societal to the individual. At each level there are a number of contributory factors at play, and these are described. The paper is confined to Western perspectives of landscape aesthetics. At the innate level are four landscape theories that postulate the reasons why humans find landscapes attractive. Also at the innate level are the philosophical underpinnings of human delight in landscapes and the Gestalt influence on preferences. The cultural influence comprises the legend of Arcadia and the Golden Age; of classicism, teleology, and landscape painting; and the emergence of the sublime, the beautiful, the picturesque, and Romanticism. At the societal level are the artistic pursuits of landscape painting and the development of parks and gardens, which reflected the perfect Italianate landscape. Also at this level are Western society’s attitude to mountains, which changed radically in the seventeenth century. Individuals are influenced by psychoanalytical pressures on the subconscious, by unconscious experiences in infancy such as a human’s preference for water, and by the influence of neuroaesthetics, which describes how the areas of the brain respond to aesthetic objects. Finally, research of landscape preferences over 50 years provides insights on the influence of landscape components, reflecting the influence of the innate, cultural, and societal factors. The combined realms of influence of each of these factors are hypothesized to explain human responses to landscapes.
Institutions
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Land
- Published
- 2025-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/land14081641
- Primary Topic
- Library Science and Administration
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00