Comparative analysis of activation functions in U-Net for binary water segmentation using Sentinel-2 imagery

Th study examines how different activation functions influence the performance of a U-Net model applied to binary water-body segmentation in Sentinel-2 imagery.Using an identical training setup for each experiment, six nonlinearities-ReLU, Leaky ReLU, ELU, PReLU, Swish and RReLU-are individually substituted into the network while all other parameters remain fixed.Comparative evaluation on a held-out validation set reveals that Leaky ReLU provides the most balanced trade-off between precision and recall, making it the preferred choice for accurate water-mask generation.PReLU offers a similar but slightly lower performance, whereas ELU excels at capturing additional water pixels at the cost of more false positives.The findings highlight the importance of activation-function selection in remote-sensing segmentation tasks and suggest further exploration of advanced nonlinearities and larger, more diverse datasets to enhance generalization.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31110/colins/2025-2/011
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of activation functions in U-Net for binary water segmentation using Sentinel-2 imagery

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Comparative analysis of activation functions in U-Net for binary water segmentation using Sentinel-2 imagery

article en

Abstract

Th study examines how different activation functions influence the performance of a U-Net model applied to binary water-body segmentation in Sentinel-2 imagery.Using an identical training setup for each experiment, six nonlinearities-ReLU, Leaky ReLU, ELU, PReLU, Swish and RReLU-are individually substituted into the network while all other parameters remain fixed.Comparative evaluation on a held-out validation set reveals that Leaky ReLU provides the most balanced trade-off between precision and recall, making it the preferred choice for accurate water-mask generation.PReLU offers a similar but slightly lower performance, whereas ELU excels at capturing additional water pixels at the cost of more false positives.The findings highlight the importance of activation-function selection in remote-sensing segmentation tasks and suggest further exploration of advanced nonlinearities and larger, more diverse datasets to enhance generalization.

Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology (UA)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.