Large-scale Innovation Competition Evaluation Scheme Based on Multi-stage Evaluation

Currently,large-scale innovation competitions are constantly emerging.The evaluation of such competitions has become an urgent problem to be solved due to subjective differences among experts and other reasons.This paper focuses on the research and design of evaluation schemes for large-scale innovation competitions.Through the analysis of the scoring results of the exis-ting competitions,the advantages and disadvantages of various evaluation schemes are comprehensively compared to find the best evaluation,so as to make the review process as programmed and efficient as possible,saving manpower and time resources.Firstly,the text constructs an expert allocation model to determine the “cross distribution” plan for reviewing experts,and uses an improved simulated annealing algorithm to solve the problem.Secondly,the text constructs a weighted model to compare four types of standard score calculation methods,and designs an improved standard score calculation method based on expert weights.Lastly,considering the correlation between large range and innovation,a range regression model is established to evaluate the model based on range.The proposed model and algorithm are widely applicable,and have important practical reference significance,and high application value.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.240400063
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large-scale Innovation Competition Evaluation Scheme Based on Multi-stage Evaluation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Large-scale Innovation Competition Evaluation Scheme Based on Multi-stage Evaluation

article en

Abstract

Currently,large-scale innovation competitions are constantly emerging.The evaluation of such competitions has become an urgent problem to be solved due to subjective differences among experts and other reasons.This paper focuses on the research and design of evaluation schemes for large-scale innovation competitions.Through the analysis of the scoring results of the exis-ting competitions,the advantages and disadvantages of various evaluation schemes are comprehensively compared to find the best evaluation,so as to make the review process as programmed and efficient as possible,saving manpower and time resources.Firstly,the text constructs an expert allocation model to determine the “cross distribution” plan for reviewing experts,and uses an improved simulated annealing algorithm to solve the problem.Secondly,the text constructs a weighted model to compare four types of standard score calculation methods,and designs an improved standard score calculation method based on expert weights.Lastly,considering the correlation between large range and innovation,a range regression model is established to evaluate the model based on range.The proposed model and algorithm are widely applicable,and have important practical reference significance,and high application value.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.