Finding mountain summits in high-resolution LiDAR data

Two semi-automated processes are described for determining all of the mountain summits above a minimum topographic prominence threshold in a large set of high-resolution LiDAR elevation measurements. The first uses a parallel algorithm to find a set of candidates, and refines the candidates by comparing against results from running the same algorithm on a much lower-resolution digital elevation model. The second uses computerassisted manual review of LiDAR point clouds to improve an existing set of candidates derived from topographic maps. Both methods identify significant deficiencies in existing LiDAR datasets, most importantly, misclassification of return type in point clouds, leading to erroneous mountain elevation and prominence values calculated from the digital terrain models in these datasets. We find a root-mean-square vertical error on 5242 non-vegetated summits in the U.S. of 1.05m due to misclassification, compared with a published specification of less than 0.1m of absolute error on the same dataset.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.175516558.86152120/v1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Water, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding mountain summits in high-resolution LiDAR data

Agriculture, Water, and Health
article

Finding mountain summits in high-resolution LiDAR data

article en

Abstract

Two semi-automated processes are described for determining all of the mountain summits above a minimum topographic prominence threshold in a large set of high-resolution LiDAR elevation measurements. The first uses a parallel algorithm to find a set of candidates, and refines the candidates by comparing against results from running the same algorithm on a much lower-resolution digital elevation model. The second uses computerassisted manual review of LiDAR point clouds to improve an existing set of candidates derived from topographic maps. Both methods identify significant deficiencies in existing LiDAR datasets, most importantly, misclassification of return type in point clouds, leading to erroneous mountain elevation and prominence values calculated from the digital terrain models in these datasets. We find a root-mean-square vertical error on 5242 non-vegetated summits in the U.S. of 1.05m due to misclassification, compared with a published specification of less than 0.1m of absolute error on the same dataset.

Stanford University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Agriculture, Water, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Finding mountain summits in high-resolution LiDAR data · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS