(De)Motivating factors of e-mentoring integration in English academic writing classrooms

It remains unquestionable that learning a language such as English through online mode may have transformative impacts on students’ motivational process. Grounded from the rationale, this study explored EFL students’ (de)motivating factors in integrating e-mentoring methods during academic writing projects. Thirteen selected university students with different demographic variables (i.e., grade, gender, university, age, language proficiency) attended multiple interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observation as data collection methods. The data were analysed through the integration of IDEEAS framework, consisting of Inclusion, Design, Engagement, Evaluation, Assessment, and Support phases and a descriptive statistical analysis. The findings are twofold. First, e-mentoring motivated EFL students to engage with academic paper writing as it effectively reduced cultural and linguistic barriers (i.e., through online tutorials, games, or discussion), promoted always-on communication (i.e., through synchronous and asynchronous modes), and relied on process rather than product (i.e., through dialogic syllabus). Nevertheless, e-mentoring remained demotivating for the students as it concerned with verbalised communication, threatened face-to-face interaction, and caused them to rely on online culture. This study implies that university stakeholders, mentors, or supervisors have to integrate e-mentoring into English learning curriculum and facilitate online learning procedures systematically. In short, motivating and demotivating factors in e-mentoring process remain critical as academic paper writing cannot be successfully engaged with online meeting. The e-mentor has to implement particular strategies by intensively utilising online apps to increase effective communication and overcome drawbacks during the academic writing project.

Publication Details

Journal
Training Language and Culture
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442x-2025-9-3-22-39
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(De)Motivating factors of e-mentoring integration in English academic writing classrooms

Training Language and Culture
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
article

(De)Motivating factors of e-mentoring integration in English academic writing classrooms

article en

Abstract

It remains unquestionable that learning a language such as English through online mode may have transformative impacts on students’ motivational process. Grounded from the rationale, this study explored EFL students’ (de)motivating factors in integrating e-mentoring methods during academic writing projects. Thirteen selected university students with different demographic variables (i.e., grade, gender, university, age, language proficiency) attended multiple interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observation as data collection methods. The data were analysed through the integration of IDEEAS framework, consisting of Inclusion, Design, Engagement, Evaluation, Assessment, and Support phases and a descriptive statistical analysis. The findings are twofold. First, e-mentoring motivated EFL students to engage with academic paper writing as it effectively reduced cultural and linguistic barriers (i.e., through online tutorials, games, or discussion), promoted always-on communication (i.e., through synchronous and asynchronous modes), and relied on process rather than product (i.e., through dialogic syllabus). Nevertheless, e-mentoring remained demotivating for the students as it concerned with verbalised communication, threatened face-to-face interaction, and caused them to rely on online culture. This study implies that university stakeholders, mentors, or supervisors have to integrate e-mentoring into English learning curriculum and facilitate online learning procedures systematically. In short, motivating and demotivating factors in e-mentoring process remain critical as academic paper writing cannot be successfully engaged with online meeting. The e-mentor has to implement particular strategies by intensively utilising online apps to increase effective communication and overcome drawbacks during the academic writing project.

Training Language and CultureVol. 9(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.