Detection Methods for Jamming and Spoofing Attacks in IoT Systems

With the increasing deployment of Internet of Things (IoT) and wireless communication systems, the threats posed by jamming and spoofing attacks have become a significant concern. Various detection methodologies have been proposed to mitigate these threats, each with distinct characteristics in terms of complexity, limitations, and efficiency. This study compares five primary detection approaches: signal analysis methodologies, statistical model methodologies, machine learning-based methodologies, blockchain-based methodologies, and hybrid methodologies. Signal analysis methods offer real-time detection but suffer from high computational overhead. Statistical models provide a balance between efficiency and complexity but may struggle with dynamic attack patterns. Machine learning-based techniques demonstrate high adaptability and accuracy; however, they require extensive training data and computational resources. Blockchain-based approaches enhance security through decentralization but introduce latency and scalability challenges. Hybrid methodologies integrate multiple approaches to optimize detection performance while mitigating individual limitations. This comparative analysis provides insights into selecting appropriate detection mechanisms based on specific application requirements and resource constraints.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icscsa66339.2025.11170969
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection Methods for Jamming and Spoofing Attacks in IoT Systems

1 citations
Higher Education Research Studies
8.93
article

Detection Methods for Jamming and Spoofing Attacks in IoT Systems

article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the increasing deployment of Internet of Things (IoT) and wireless communication systems, the threats posed by jamming and spoofing attacks have become a significant concern. Various detection methodologies have been proposed to mitigate these threats, each with distinct characteristics in terms of complexity, limitations, and efficiency. This study compares five primary detection approaches: signal analysis methodologies, statistical model methodologies, machine learning-based methodologies, blockchain-based methodologies, and hybrid methodologies. Signal analysis methods offer real-time detection but suffer from high computational overhead. Statistical models provide a balance between efficiency and complexity but may struggle with dynamic attack patterns. Machine learning-based techniques demonstrate high adaptability and accuracy; however, they require extensive training data and computational resources. Blockchain-based approaches enhance security through decentralization but introduce latency and scalability challenges. Hybrid methodologies integrate multiple approaches to optimize detection performance while mitigating individual limitations. This comparative analysis provides insights into selecting appropriate detection mechanisms based on specific application requirements and resource constraints.

Shree Krishna Hospital (IN), Advanced Numerical Research and Analysis Group (IN), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Salem College (US), Saveetha University (IN), Dr. Hari Singh Gour University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education Research Studies
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detection Methods for Jamming and Spoofing Attacks in IoT Systems · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS