Knowledge of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines among Doctors in Tertiary Hospitals in South-South Nigeria.

Background: The GINA guidelines have become the "gold standard" in the management of asthma. A good understanding by physicians of these guidelines is an essential step in applying the GINA guidelines to patient care. This study aimed to assess physician's knowledge of the GINA guidelines among Physicians in South-South Nigeria. Study Design: 31 multiple choice questions based on recommendations of GINA guidelines were distributed to physicians of all cadre who manage adult asthma patients in three tertiary hospitals in South-South Nigeria. Result: 87 physicians completed the test including physicians in respiratory unit (4), physicians in Family Medicine (20) and physicians in Internal Medicine (63). The mean total score for all physicians who took the test was 39.7 ± 14.5 % (mean ± SD). Pulmonologists recorded the highest total score (68.5 ± 5.5%) followed by Internists (38.8 ± 13.5%) then by Family Physicians (37.1 ± 13.2%). The Consultants had the highest average total score (49.0 ± 11.7%) followed by Senior Residents (40.8 ± 17.4%), Junior Residents (40.7 ± 13.5%), Medical Officers (35.5 ±0.0%) finally the House Officers (31.5 ± 13.6%). Physicians performed best in questions concerning disease diagnosis but the poorest scores were obtained in questions concerning asthma education. Less than a third had attended any CME after graduation. Conclusion: The physicians' understanding of the GINA guidelines is generally poor. Specialist training in respiratory diseases did improve scores. The findings of this survey may provide some explanation to poor level of asthma control.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82222/njcd.vol1no1.61
Primary Topic
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines among Doctors in Tertiary Hospitals in South-South Nigeria.

Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
article

Knowledge of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines among Doctors in Tertiary Hospitals in South-South Nigeria.

article en

Abstract

Background: The GINA guidelines have become the "gold standard" in the management of asthma. A good understanding by physicians of these guidelines is an essential step in applying the GINA guidelines to patient care. This study aimed to assess physician's knowledge of the GINA guidelines among Physicians in South-South Nigeria. Study Design: 31 multiple choice questions based on recommendations of GINA guidelines were distributed to physicians of all cadre who manage adult asthma patients in three tertiary hospitals in South-South Nigeria. Result: 87 physicians completed the test including physicians in respiratory unit (4), physicians in Family Medicine (20) and physicians in Internal Medicine (63). The mean total score for all physicians who took the test was 39.7 ± 14.5 % (mean ± SD). Pulmonologists recorded the highest total score (68.5 ± 5.5%) followed by Internists (38.8 ± 13.5%) then by Family Physicians (37.1 ± 13.2%). The Consultants had the highest average total score (49.0 ± 11.7%) followed by Senior Residents (40.8 ± 17.4%), Junior Residents (40.7 ± 13.5%), Medical Officers (35.5 ±0.0%) finally the House Officers (31.5 ± 13.6%). Physicians performed best in questions concerning disease diagnosis but the poorest scores were obtained in questions concerning asthma education. Less than a third had attended any CME after graduation. Conclusion: The physicians' understanding of the GINA guidelines is generally poor. Specialist training in respiratory diseases did improve scores. The findings of this survey may provide some explanation to poor level of asthma control.

University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (NG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.